Article: Matthew 1:25 by Scion of Zion - Revision history

KJV: Template:Donate

2019-05-04T03:44:31Z

Template:Donate

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:44, 4 May 2019
Line 62:		Line 62:

	* [http://www.scionofzion.com/matthew_1_25.htm Matthew 1:25] by [[Scion of Zion]]		* [http://www.scionofzion.com/matthew_1_25.htm Matthew 1:25] by [[Scion of Zion]]

			{{Donate}}

Nick at 09:59, 10 January 2012

2012-01-10T09:59:32Z

Nick: /* See Also */

2011-04-26T22:24:27Z

Nick: /* See Also */

2011-04-26T22:24:12Z

Nick: /* Affected Teaching */

2011-04-26T22:22:49Z

Affected Teaching

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 26 April 2011
Line 51:		Line 51:

	So tonight or tomorrow when your Pastor reads the narrative about the birth of Jesus from the book of Matthew in a modern version, then realize he is perpetuating the Roman Catholic error of the perpetual virginity of Mary which has caused many true Christians to be put to death under their inquisition because they refused to believe what was false in light of Mark 6:1-3.		So tonight or tomorrow when your Pastor reads the narrative about the birth of Jesus from the book of Matthew in a modern version, then realize he is perpetuating the Roman Catholic error of the perpetual virginity of Mary which has caused many true Christians to be put to death under their inquisition because they refused to believe what was false in light of Mark 6:1-3.

			End of article.

			==See Also==

			* [[Matthew 1:25]]

Nick: Protected "Article: Matthew 1:25 by Scion of Zion" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2011-04-22T03:01:06Z

Protected "Article: Matthew 1:25 by Scion of Zion" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:01, 22 April 2011
(No difference)

Nick at 03:01, 22 April 2011

2011-04-22T03:01:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 22 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Matthew 1:25==		==[[Matthew 1:25]]==
	(KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.		(KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

Nick at 03:00, 22 April 2011

2011-04-22T03:00:53Z

Nick: New page: Matthew 1:25 Matthew 1:25 (KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. (1611 KJV) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth h...

2011-04-22T03:00:14Z

New page: Matthew 1:25 Matthew 1:25 (KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS. (1611 KJV) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth h...

New page

Matthew 1:25

Matthew 1:25
(KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.
(1611 KJV) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth her first borne sonne, and he called his name Iesus.
(1560 Geneva Bible) But he knew her not, til she had broght forth her first borne sonne, & he called his name Iesus.
(1526 Tyndale) and knewe her not tyll she had brought forth hir fyrst sonne and called hys name Iesus.

Counterfeit Versions
(NIV) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
(ESV) but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.
(NASB) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.
(HCSB) but did not know her intimately until she gave birth to a son. And he named Him Jesus.
(1901 ASV) and knew her not till she had brought forth a son: and he called his name JESUS.
(CEV) But they did not sleep together before her baby was born. Then Joseph named him Jesus.
(RSV) but knew her not until she had borne a son; and he called his name Jesus.
(NRSV) but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.
(NAB-Roman Catholic) He had no relations with her until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus.
(NWT-Jehovah’s Witness) But he had no intercourse with her until she gave birth to a son; and he called his name Jesus.

Textus Receptus
kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV ou eteken ton uion authV ton prwtotokon kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun

Hort-Westcott Critical Text
kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV [ou] eteken uion kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun

Corrupted Manuscripts
This verse is corrupted in the following manuscripts:
Aleph 01 - Sinaiticus - Fourth century
B 03 - Vaticanus - Fourth century
1 (miniscule) - Seventh century
13 (miniscule) - Eighth century
33 (Miniscule) - Ninth Century

Affected Teaching
The Greek word for “firstborn” is omitted in both (B) and (Aleph). By removing this word in the modern versions, it endorses the Roman Catholic doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. The word “firstborn” automatically indicates that Mary did have other children and the Bible tells us that she did in the following:

(Mark 6:2-3 KJV) And when the sabbath day was come, he began to teach in the synagogue: and many hearing him were astonished, saying, From whence hath this man these things? and what wisdom is this which is given unto him, that even such mighty works are wrought by his hands? {3} Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

By removing the word “firstborn” it can also set up erroneous beliefs that Mary had children before she had Jesus. That word “firstborn” is pivotal to the doctrine of the Virgin Birth. The removal of this word is a serious breach of truth and can lead to the denial of the Virgin Birth of Christ. If Christ was not born of a Virgin, then we will still be in our sins and bound for Hell. The modern versions, along with the Jehovah’s Witness version, all agree with the Roman Catholic Institution’s teaching that Mary was a perpetual Virgin. For someone to say that the modern versions do not stem from Roman Catholic Manuscripts is willful denial of the truth, keep in mind the two manuscripts which omit “Firstborn.” The two are Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, both manuscripts were in the hands of the Roman Church, yet have become the primary manuscripts underlying the modern versions.

So tonight or tomorrow when your Pastor reads the narrative about the birth of Jesus from the book of Matthew in a modern version, then realize he is perpetuating the Roman Catholic error of the perpetual virginity of Mary which has caused many true Christians to be put to death under their inquisition because they refused to believe what was false in light of Mark 6:1-3.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 26 April 2011
Line 57:		Line 57:

	* [[Matthew 1:25]]		* [[Matthew 1:25]]
			* [[Scion of Zion]]

	==External Links==		==External Links==

	* [http://www.scionofzion.com/matthew_1_25.htm Matthew 1:25] by [[Scion of Zion]]		* [http://www.scionofzion.com/matthew_1_25.htm Matthew 1:25] by [[Scion of Zion]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 10 January 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==[[Matthew 1:25]]==		==[[Matthew 1:25]]==
	(KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.		([[KJV]]) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

	(1611 KJV) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth her first borne sonne, and he called his name Iesus.		([[1611 AD\|1611]] [[KJV]]) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth her first borne sonne, and he called his name Iesus.

	(1560 Geneva Bible) But he knew her not, til she had broght forth her first borne sonne, & he called his name Iesus.		([[1560 AD\|1560]] [[Geneva Bible]]) But he knew her not, til she had broght forth her first borne sonne, & he called his name Iesus.

	(1526 Tyndale) and knewe her not tyll she had brought forth hir fyrst sonne and called hys name Iesus.		(1526 Tyndale) and knewe her not tyll she had brought forth hir fyrst sonne and called hys name Iesus.

	==Counterfeit Versions==		==Counterfeit Versions==
	(NIV) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.		([[NIV]]) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

	(ESV) but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.		([[ESV]]) but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.

	(NASB) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.		([[NASB]]) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

	(HCSB) but did not know her intimately until she gave birth to a son. And he named Him Jesus.		([[HCSB]]) but did not know her intimately until she gave birth to a son. And he named Him Jesus.

	(1901 ASV) and knew her not till she had brought forth a son: and he called his name JESUS.		(1901 [ASV]]) and knew her not till she had brought forth a son: and he called his name JESUS.

	(CEV) But they did not sleep together before her baby was born. Then Joseph named him Jesus.		([CEV]]) But they did not sleep together before her baby was born. Then Joseph named him Jesus.

	(RSV) but knew her not until she had borne a son; and he called his name Jesus.		([[RSV]]) but knew her not until she had borne a son; and he called his name Jesus.

	(NRSV) but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.		([[NRSV]]) but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.

	(NAB-Roman Catholic) He had no relations with her until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus.		([[NAB]]-Roman Catholic) He had no relations with her until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus.

	(NWT-Jehovah’s Witness) But he had no intercourse with her until she gave birth to a son; and he called his name Jesus.		([[NWT]]-Jehovah’s Witness) But he had no intercourse with her until she gave birth to a son; and he called his name Jesus.

	==Textus Receptus==		==[[Textus Receptus]]==
	kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV ou eteken ton uion authV ton prwtotokon kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun		kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV ou eteken ton uion authV ton prwtotokon kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun

Line 46:		Line 46:
	The Greek word for “firstborn” is omitted in both (B) and (Aleph). By removing this word in the modern versions, it endorses the Roman Catholic doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. The word “firstborn” automatically indicates that Mary did have other children and the Bible tells us that she did in the following:		The Greek word for “firstborn” is omitted in both (B) and (Aleph). By removing this word in the modern versions, it endorses the Roman Catholic doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. The word “firstborn” automatically indicates that Mary did have other children and the Bible tells us that she did in the following:

	(Mark 6:2-3 KJV) And when the sabbath day was come, he began to teach in the synagogue: and many hearing him were astonished, saying, From whence hath this man these things? and what wisdom is this which is given unto him, that even such mighty works are wrought by his hands? {3} Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.		([[Mark 6:2]]-[[Mark 6:3\|3]] [[KJV]]) And when the sabbath day was come, he began to teach in the synagogue: and many hearing him were astonished, saying, From whence hath this man these things? and what wisdom is this which is given unto him, that even such mighty works are wrought by his hands? {3} Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, the brother of James, and Joses, and of Juda, and Simon? and are not his sisters here with us? And they were offended at him.

	By removing the word “firstborn” it can also set up erroneous beliefs that Mary had children before she had Jesus. That word “firstborn” is pivotal to the doctrine of the Virgin Birth. The removal of this word is a serious breach of truth and can lead to the denial of the Virgin Birth of Christ. If Christ was not born of a Virgin, then we will still be in our sins and bound for Hell. The modern versions, along with the Jehovah’s Witness version, all agree with the Roman Catholic Institution’s teaching that Mary was a perpetual Virgin. For someone to say that the modern versions do not stem from Roman Catholic Manuscripts is willful denial of the truth, keep in mind the two manuscripts which omit “Firstborn.” The two are Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, both manuscripts were in the hands of the Roman Church, yet have become the primary manuscripts underlying the modern versions.		By removing the word “firstborn” it can also set up erroneous beliefs that Mary had children before she had Jesus. That word “firstborn” is pivotal to the doctrine of the Virgin Birth. The removal of this word is a serious breach of truth and can lead to the denial of the Virgin Birth of Christ. If Christ was not born of a Virgin, then we will still be in our sins and bound for Hell. The modern versions, along with the Jehovah’s Witness version, all agree with the Roman Catholic Institution’s teaching that Mary was a perpetual Virgin. For someone to say that the modern versions do not stem from Roman Catholic Manuscripts is willful denial of the truth, keep in mind the two manuscripts which omit “Firstborn.” The two are Vaticanus and Sinaiticus, both manuscripts were in the hands of the Roman Church, yet have become the primary manuscripts underlying the modern versions.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 22 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Matthew 1:25		==Matthew 1:25==

	~~Matthew 1:25~~
	(KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.		(KJV) And knew her not till she had brought forth her firstborn son: and he called his name JESUS.

	(1611 KJV) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth her first borne sonne, and he called his name Iesus.		(1611 KJV) And knewe her not, till shee had brought forth her first borne sonne, and he called his name Iesus.

	(1560 Geneva Bible) But he knew her not, til she had broght forth her first borne sonne, & he called his name Iesus.		(1560 Geneva Bible) But he knew her not, til she had broght forth her first borne sonne, & he called his name Iesus.

	(1526 Tyndale) and knewe her not tyll she had brought forth hir fyrst sonne and called hys name Iesus.		(1526 Tyndale) and knewe her not tyll she had brought forth hir fyrst sonne and called hys name Iesus.

	Counterfeit Versions		==Counterfeit Versions==
	(NIV) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.		(NIV) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

	(ESV) but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.		(ESV) but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus.

	(NASB) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.		(NASB) But he had no union with her until she gave birth to a son. And he gave him the name Jesus.

	(HCSB) but did not know her intimately until she gave birth to a son. And he named Him Jesus.		(HCSB) but did not know her intimately until she gave birth to a son. And he named Him Jesus.

	(1901 ASV) and knew her not till she had brought forth a son: and he called his name JESUS.		(1901 ASV) and knew her not till she had brought forth a son: and he called his name JESUS.

	(CEV) But they did not sleep together before her baby was born. Then Joseph named him Jesus.		(CEV) But they did not sleep together before her baby was born. Then Joseph named him Jesus.

	(RSV) but knew her not until she had borne a son; and he called his name Jesus.		(RSV) but knew her not until she had borne a son; and he called his name Jesus.

	(NRSV) but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.		(NRSV) but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.

	(NAB-Roman Catholic) He had no relations with her until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus.		(NAB-Roman Catholic) He had no relations with her until she bore a son, and he named him Jesus.

	(NWT-Jehovah’s Witness) But he had no intercourse with her until she gave birth to a son; and he called his name Jesus.		(NWT-Jehovah’s Witness) But he had no intercourse with her until she gave birth to a son; and he called his name Jesus.

	Textus Receptus		==Textus Receptus==
	kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV ou eteken ton uion authV ton prwtotokon kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun		kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV ou eteken ton uion authV ton prwtotokon kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun

	Hort-Westcott Critical Text		==Hort-Westcott Critical Text==
	kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV [ou] eteken uion kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun		kai ouk eginwsken authn ewV [ou] eteken uion kai ekalesen to onoma autou ihsoun

	Corrupted Manuscripts		==Corrupted Manuscripts==
	This verse is corrupted in the following manuscripts:		This verse is corrupted in the following manuscripts:
	Aleph 01 - Sinaiticus - Fourth century		Aleph 01 - Sinaiticus - Fourth century
Line 33:		Line 43:
	33 (Miniscule) - Ninth Century		33 (Miniscule) - Ninth Century

	Affected Teaching		==Affected Teaching==
	The Greek word for “firstborn” is omitted in both (B) and (Aleph). By removing this word in the modern versions, it endorses the Roman Catholic doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. The word “firstborn” automatically indicates that Mary did have other children and the Bible tells us that she did in the following:		The Greek word for “firstborn” is omitted in both (B) and (Aleph). By removing this word in the modern versions, it endorses the Roman Catholic doctrine of the perpetual virginity of Mary. The word “firstborn” automatically indicates that Mary did have other children and the Bible tells us that she did in the following: