Biblical literalism - Revision history

Beza 1598: /* See also */

2016-03-11T15:37:31Z

Nick at 08:21, 26 December 2012

2012-12-26T08:21:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 26 December 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{BibleRelated}}		{{BibleRelated}}
	'''Biblical literalism''' (also called Biblicism or Biblical fundamentalism) is the interpretation or translation of the explicit and primary sense of words in the [[Bible]].<~~ref~~>''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' Houghton Mifflin; 4 edition (September 14, 2000) defines literalism as "1. Adherence to the explicit sense of a given text or doctrine. 2. Literal portrayal; realism."</~~ref~~><~~ref~~>~~Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801034132 \| last = Elwell \| first = Walter A. \| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology \| location = Grand Rapids, Mich. \| date = 1984 p. 643~~ </~~ref~~> A literal, Biblical interpretation is associated with the fundamentalist and evangelical [[hermeneutics\|hermeneutical]] approach to Scripture, and is used by most [[conservative Christianity\|conservative Christians]] today.<~~ref~~> [~~http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=97803346 ''Beyond Biblical Literalism and Inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the Hermeneutic Interpretation of Scripture''~~]~~, John Bartkowski, Sociology of Religion, 57, 1996.~~ </~~ref~~> The essence of this approach focuses upon the author's intent as the primary meaning of the text.<~~ref name=elwell~~> [~~http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/literali.htm ''Elwell Evangelical Dictionary''~~]~~, Walter A. Elwell, Baker Publishing Group, May 1996, ISBN 0-8010-2049-2~~</~~ref~~> Literal interpretation does place emphasis upon the referential aspect of the words or terms in the text. It does not, however, mean a complete denial of literary aspects, genre, or figures of speech within the text (e.g., parable, allegory, simile, or metaphor).<~~ref~~>Cite book \| edition = Rev. and expanded \| publisher = Moody Press \| isbn = 0802421873 \| pages = 224 \| last = Ryrie \| first = Charles Caldwell \| title = Dispensationalism \| location = Chicago \| date = 1995 p. 81</~~ref~~> Also literalism does not necessarily lead to total and complete agreement upon one single interpretation for any given passage.		'''Biblical literalism''' (also called Biblicism or Biblical fundamentalism) is the interpretation or translation of the explicit and primary sense of words in the [[Bible]].<sup>[]</sup><sup>[]</sup> A literal, Biblical interpretation is associated with the fundamentalist and evangelical [[hermeneutics\|hermeneutical]] approach to Scripture, and is used by most [[conservative Christianity\|conservative Christians]] today.<sup>[]</sup> The essence of this approach focuses upon the author's intent as the primary meaning of the text.<sup>[]</sup> Literal interpretation does place emphasis upon the referential aspect of the words or terms in the text. It does not, however, mean a complete denial of literary aspects, genre, or figures of speech within the text (e.g., parable, allegory, simile, or metaphor).<sup>[]</sup> Also literalism does not necessarily lead to total and complete agreement upon one single interpretation for any given passage.

	There are two kinds of literal interpretation, letterism and the more common historical-grammatical method. Letterism attempts to uncover the meaning of the text through a strict emphasis upon a mechanical, wooden literalism of words. This approach often obscures the literary aspects and consequently the primary meaning of the text.<~~ref~~>~~Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801076005 \| last = Ramm \| first = Bernard \| title = Protestant Biblical Interpretation \| date = 1970 p.48~~ </~~ref~~> The [[Historical-grammatical method\|historical grammatical method]] is a [[Biblical hermeneutics\|hermeneutic]] technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words, but also the syntactical aspects, the cultural and historical background, and the literary genre.		There are two kinds of literal interpretation, letterism and the more common historical-grammatical method. Letterism attempts to uncover the meaning of the text through a strict emphasis upon a mechanical, wooden literalism of words. This approach often obscures the literary aspects and consequently the primary meaning of the text.<sup>[]</sup> The [[Historical-grammatical method\|historical grammatical method]] is a [[Biblical hermeneutics\|hermeneutic]] technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words, but also the syntactical aspects, the cultural and historical background, and the literary genre.

	Fundamentalists and Evangelicals sometimes refer to themselves as "literalists" or Biblical literalists. Sociologists also use the term in reference to conservative Christian beliefs which include not just literalism but also inerrancy. Often the term Biblical literalism is used as a pejorative to describe or ridicule the interpretative approaches of fundamentalist or evangelical Christians.<~~ref~~>~~Laurence Wood, 'Theology as History and Hermeneutics', (2005)~~</~~ref~~><~~ref~~>~~George Regas, 'Take Another Look At Your Good Book', Los Angeles Times, February 3, 2000~~</~~ref><ref>Dhyanchand Carr, 'Christian Council of Asia: Partnership in Mission, Conference on World Mission and the Role of Korean Churches, November 1995</ref~~>		Fundamentalists and Evangelicals sometimes refer to themselves as "literalists" or Biblical literalists. Sociologists also use the term in reference to conservative Christian beliefs which include not just literalism but also inerrancy. Often the term Biblical literalism is used as a pejorative to describe or ridicule the interpretative approaches of fundamentalist or evangelical Christians.<sup>[]</sup><sup>[]</sup>

	== Clarity of Scripture ==		== Clarity of Scripture ==
	The vast majority of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians hold that scripture is [[Clarity of scripture\|perspicuous]], or that the basic meaning and teachings of Scripture are clear enough to be understood by the average person. It refers to the product (teachings of Scripture) rather than the process of interpretation itself ([[Exegesis]]). [[Martin Luther]] distinguished between external and internal aspects within the [[Clarity of scripture]]. External clarity concerns the principles of hermeneutics (including grammatical aspects) and guidance into understanding through the process of interpretation. The internal clarity concerns [[illumination]] of the believer - that is, guidance into understanding by the Holy Spirit.<~~ref~~>Cite book \| publisher = InterVarsity Press \| isbn = 0830828265 \| last = Osborne \| first = Grant R \| title = The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation \| date = 2006 p. 27</~~ref~~>		The vast majority of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians hold that scripture is [[Clarity of scripture\|perspicuous]], or that the basic meaning and teachings of Scripture are clear enough to be understood by the average person. It refers to the product (teachings of Scripture) rather than the process of interpretation itself ([[Exegesis]]). [[Martin Luther]] distinguished between external and internal aspects within the [[Clarity of scripture]]. External clarity concerns the principles of hermeneutics (including grammatical aspects) and guidance into understanding through the process of interpretation. The internal clarity concerns [[illumination]] of the believer - that is, guidance into understanding by the Holy Spirit.<sup>[]</sup>

	So [[clarity of scripture]] does not mean that no interpretation principles are necessary, or that there is no cultural gap between Scripture and today. Instead [[exegesis]] and interpretation principles are utilized as part of the process to close the cultural gap in striving to understand. What the clarity of scripture does deny is that the Bible is a code to decipher, or that it cannot be understood apart from complex academic analysis as is typical in the [[Historical-critical method]] of interpretation.<~~ref~~>~~Cite book \| publisher = Victor Books \| isbn = 0896938190 \| pages = 324 \| last = Zuck \| first = Roy B \| title = Basic Bible Interpretation \| location = Wheaton, Ill \| date = 1991 p. 26~~</~~ref~~>		So [[clarity of scripture]] does not mean that no interpretation principles are necessary, or that there is no cultural gap between Scripture and today. Instead [[exegesis]] and interpretation principles are utilized as part of the process to close the cultural gap in striving to understand. What the clarity of scripture does deny is that the Bible is a code to decipher, or that it cannot be understood apart from complex academic analysis as is typical in the [[Historical-critical method]] of interpretation.<sup>[]</sup>

	==Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical ==		==Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical ==

	Biblical literalists believe that, unless a passage is clearly intended as allegory, poetry, or some other genre, the Bible should be interpreted as literal statements by the author. [[Fundamentalists]] therefore treat as simple history such passages as the [[Creation according to Genesis]], the [[Deluge (mythology)\|Deluge]] and [[Noah's ark]], and the unnaturally long life-spans of the Patriarchs given in [[genealogies of Genesis]], as well as the strict historicity of the narrative accounts of [[Ancient Israel]], the [[supernatural]] interventions of [[God]] in history, and [[Miracles of Jesus\|Jesus' miracles]].<~~ref~~>[~~http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/publications/knowingDoing/2004/Miracles.pdf#search=%22miracles%20C.S.Lewis%22 ''Lewis on Miracles''~~]~~, Art Lindsley, Knowing & Doing; A Teaching Quarterly for Discipleship of Heart and Mind:~~		Biblical literalists believe that, unless a passage is clearly intended as allegory, poetry, or some other genre, the Bible should be interpreted as literal statements by the author. [[Fundamentalists]] therefore treat as simple history such passages as the [[Creation according to Genesis]], the [[Deluge (mythology)\|Deluge]] and [[Noah's ark]], and the unnaturally long life-spans of the Patriarchs given in [[genealogies of Genesis]], as well as the strict historicity of the narrative accounts of [[Ancient Israel]], the [[supernatural]] interventions of [[God]] in history, and [[Miracles of Jesus\|Jesus' miracles]].<sup>[]</sup>
	~~C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE, Fall 2004~~</ref><ref>[http://www.icr.org/pdf/imp/imp-395.pdf#search=%22Genesis%20Flood%20Whitcomb%22 ''The History and Impact of the Book, The Genesis Flood''], John C. Whitcomb, Impact, Number 395, May 2006</ref>		Literalism does not question that parables, metaphors and allegory exist in the Bible, but rather relies on contextual interpretations based on the author's intention.<sup>[]</sup>
	Literalism does not question that parables, metaphors and allegory exist in the Bible, but rather relies on contextual interpretations based on the author's intention.<~~ref name=Chicago~~>[~~http://www.bible-researcher.com/chicago2.html ''Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics With commentary by Norman L. Geisler''~~]~~, Reproduced from ''Explaining Hermeneutics: A Commentary on the Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics'', Oakland, California: International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, 1983.~~</~~ref~~>

	As a part of ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy]]''<~~ref name=Chicago2~~>[~~http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/chicago.htm ''The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy''~~] ~~(1997)~~</~~ref~~> conservative Christian scholarship affirms the following:		As a part of ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy]]''<sup>[]</sup> conservative Christian scholarship affirms the following:

	WE AFFIRM the necessity of interpreting the Bible according to its literal, or normal, sense. The literal sense is the grammatical-historical sense, that is, the meaning which the writer expressed. Interpretation according to the literal sense will take account of all figures of speech and literary forms found in the text.		WE AFFIRM the necessity of interpreting the Bible according to its literal, or normal, sense. The literal sense is the grammatical-historical sense, that is, the meaning which the writer expressed. Interpretation according to the literal sense will take account of all figures of speech and literary forms found in the text.
Line 25:		Line 24:
	Noted inerrantist [[Norman Geisler]] in his commentary on the ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics]]'' states:		Noted inerrantist [[Norman Geisler]] in his commentary on the ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics]]'' states:

			"The literal sense of Scripture is strongly affirmed here. To be sure the English word literal carries some problematic connotations with it. Hence the words normal and grammatical-historical are used to explain what is meant. The literal sense is also designated by the more descriptive title grammatical-historical sense. This means the correct interpretation is the one which discovers the meaning of the text in its grammatical forms and in the historical, cultural context in which the text is expressed." <sup>[]</sup>
	"The literal sense of Scripture is strongly affirmed here. To be sure the English word literal carries some problematic connotations with it. Hence the words normal and grammatical-historical are used to explain what is meant. The literal sense is also designated by the more descriptive title grammatical-historical sense. This means the correct interpretation is the one which discovers the meaning of the text in its grammatical forms and in the historical, cultural context in which the text is expressed." <~~ref name=Chicago~~/>

	== Pejorative use ==		== Pejorative use ==
	The term "Biblical Literalism" is often used pejoratively.		The term "Biblical Literalism" is often used pejoratively.

	[[Conrad Hyers]], professor of comparative religion at [[Gustavus Adolphus College]] in [[St. Peter, Minnesota]], criticized this as "a mentality [that] manifests itself [not] only in conservative churches, private-school enclaves, television programs of the evangelical right, and a considerable amount of Christian bookstore material; one often finds a literalist understanding of Bible and faith being assumed by those who have no religious inclinations, or who are avowedly antireligious in sentiment. Even in educated circles the possibility of more sophisticated theologies... is easily obscured by burning [[straw man\|straw effigies]] of biblical literalism."<~~ref~~>~~Hyers, Conrad~~ [~~http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1332 "Biblical Literalism: Constricting the Cosmic Dance"~~]~~, ''Christian Century'', August 4-11, 1982, p. 823.~~</~~ref~~>		[[Conrad Hyers]], professor of comparative religion at [[Gustavus Adolphus College]] in [[St. Peter, Minnesota]], criticized this as "a mentality [that] manifests itself [not] only in conservative churches, private-school enclaves, television programs of the evangelical right, and a considerable amount of Christian bookstore material; one often finds a literalist understanding of Bible and faith being assumed by those who have no religious inclinations, or who are avowedly antireligious in sentiment. Even in educated circles the possibility of more sophisticated theologies... is easily obscured by burning [[straw man\|straw effigies]] of biblical literalism."<sup>[]</sup>

	Steve Falkenberg, professor of religious psychology at [[Eastern Kentucky University]], says, "I've never met anyone who actually believes the Bible is literally true. I know a bunch of people who say they believe the Bible is literally true but nobody is actually a literalist. Taken literally, the Bible says the earth is flat and setting on pillars and cannot move (Ps 93:1, Ps 96:10, 1 Sam 2:8, Job 9:6). It says that great sea monsters are set to guard the edge of the sea (Job 41, Ps 104:26)..." <~~ref~~>~~Falkenberg, Steve~~ [~~http://www.newreformation.org/literalism.htm ''Biblical Literalism''~~]~~, ''New Reformation'', 2002.~~ </~~ref~~>		Steve Falkenberg, professor of religious psychology at [[Eastern Kentucky University]], says, "I've never met anyone who actually believes the Bible is literally true. I know a bunch of people who say they believe the Bible is literally true but nobody is actually a literalist. Taken literally, the Bible says the earth is flat and setting on pillars and cannot move (Ps 93:1, Ps 96:10, 1 Sam 2:8, Job 9:6). It says that great sea monsters are set to guard the edge of the sea (Job 41, Ps 104:26)..." <sup>[]</sup> The bible speaks of neither.

	==References==		==References==

Nick: Protected "Biblical literalism" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

2009-08-17T07:32:03Z

Protected "Biblical literalism" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:32, 17 August 2009
(No difference)

Nick: /* Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical */

2009-08-17T07:31:50Z

Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:31, 17 August 2009
Line 19:		Line 19:
	As a part of ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy]]''<ref name=Chicago2>[http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/chicago.htm ''The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy''] (1997)</ref> conservative Christian scholarship affirms the following:		As a part of ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy]]''<ref name=Chicago2>[http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/chicago.htm ''The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy''] (1997)</ref> conservative Christian scholarship affirms the following:

	~~{{quotation\|"~~WE AFFIRM the necessity of interpreting the Bible according to its literal, or normal, sense. The literal sense is the grammatical-historical sense, that is, the meaning which the writer expressed. Interpretation according to the literal sense will take account of all figures of speech and literary forms found in the text.		WE AFFIRM the necessity of interpreting the Bible according to its literal, or normal, sense. The literal sense is the grammatical-historical sense, that is, the meaning which the writer expressed. Interpretation according to the literal sense will take account of all figures of speech and literary forms found in the text.

	WE DENY the legitimacy of any approach to Scripture that attributes to it meaning which the literal sense does not support."}}		WE DENY the legitimacy of any approach to Scripture that attributes to it meaning which the literal sense does not support."

	Noted inerrantist [[Norman Geisler]] in his commentary on the ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics]]'' states:		Noted inerrantist [[Norman Geisler]] in his commentary on the ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics]]'' states:

	~~{{quotation\|~~
	"The literal sense of Scripture is strongly affirmed here. To be sure the English word literal carries some problematic connotations with it. Hence the words normal and grammatical-historical are used to explain what is meant. The literal sense is also designated by the more descriptive title grammatical-historical sense. This means the correct interpretation is the one which discovers the meaning of the text in its grammatical forms and in the historical, cultural context in which the text is expressed." <ref name=Chicago/>}}		"The literal sense of Scripture is strongly affirmed here. To be sure the English word literal carries some problematic connotations with it. Hence the words normal and grammatical-historical are used to explain what is meant. The literal sense is also designated by the more descriptive title grammatical-historical sense. This means the correct interpretation is the one which discovers the meaning of the text in its grammatical forms and in the historical, cultural context in which the text is expressed." <ref name=Chicago/>

	== Pejorative use ==		== Pejorative use ==

Nick at 07:31, 17 August 2009

2009-08-17T07:31:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:31, 17 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{BibleRelated}}		{{BibleRelated}}
	'''Biblical literalism''' (also called Biblicism or Biblical fundamentalism) is the interpretation or translation of the explicit and primary sense of words in the [[Bible]].<ref>''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' Houghton Mifflin; 4 edition (September 14, 2000) defines literalism as "1. Adherence to the explicit sense of a given text or doctrine. 2. Literal portrayal; realism."</ref><ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801034132 \| last = Elwell \| first = Walter A. \| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology \| location = Grand Rapids, Mich. \| date = 1984 }} p. 643 </ref> A literal, Biblical interpretation is associated with the fundamentalist and evangelical [[hermeneutics\|hermeneutical]] approach to Scripture, and is used by most [[conservative Christianity\|conservative Christians]] today.<ref> [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=97803346 ''Beyond Biblical Literalism and Inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the Hermeneutic Interpretation of Scripture''], John Bartkowski, Sociology of Religion, 57, 1996. </ref> The essence of this approach focuses upon the author's intent as the primary meaning of the text.<ref name=elwell> [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/literali.htm ''Elwell Evangelical Dictionary''], Walter A. Elwell, Baker Publishing Group, May 1996, ISBN 0-8010-2049-2</ref> Literal interpretation does place emphasis upon the referential aspect of the words or terms in the text. It does not, however, mean a complete denial of literary aspects, genre, or figures of speech within the text (e.g., parable, allegory, simile, or metaphor).<ref>{{Cite book \| edition = Rev. and expanded \| publisher = Moody Press \| isbn = 0802421873 \| pages = 224 \| last = Ryrie \| first = Charles Caldwell \| title = Dispensationalism \| location = Chicago \| date = 1995 }} p. 81</ref> Also literalism does not necessarily lead to total and complete agreement upon one single interpretation for any given passage.		'''Biblical literalism''' (also called Biblicism or Biblical fundamentalism) is the interpretation or translation of the explicit and primary sense of words in the [[Bible]].<ref>''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' Houghton Mifflin; 4 edition (September 14, 2000) defines literalism as "1. Adherence to the explicit sense of a given text or doctrine. 2. Literal portrayal; realism."</ref><ref>Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801034132 \| last = Elwell \| first = Walter A. \| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology \| location = Grand Rapids, Mich. \| date = 1984 p. 643 </ref> A literal, Biblical interpretation is associated with the fundamentalist and evangelical [[hermeneutics\|hermeneutical]] approach to Scripture, and is used by most [[conservative Christianity\|conservative Christians]] today.<ref> [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=97803346 ''Beyond Biblical Literalism and Inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the Hermeneutic Interpretation of Scripture''], John Bartkowski, Sociology of Religion, 57, 1996. </ref> The essence of this approach focuses upon the author's intent as the primary meaning of the text.<ref name=elwell> [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/literali.htm ''Elwell Evangelical Dictionary''], Walter A. Elwell, Baker Publishing Group, May 1996, ISBN 0-8010-2049-2</ref> Literal interpretation does place emphasis upon the referential aspect of the words or terms in the text. It does not, however, mean a complete denial of literary aspects, genre, or figures of speech within the text (e.g., parable, allegory, simile, or metaphor).<ref>Cite book \| edition = Rev. and expanded \| publisher = Moody Press \| isbn = 0802421873 \| pages = 224 \| last = Ryrie \| first = Charles Caldwell \| title = Dispensationalism \| location = Chicago \| date = 1995 p. 81</ref> Also literalism does not necessarily lead to total and complete agreement upon one single interpretation for any given passage.

	There are two kinds of literal interpretation, letterism and the more common historical-grammatical method. Letterism attempts to uncover the meaning of the text through a strict emphasis upon a mechanical, wooden literalism of words. This approach often obscures the literary aspects and consequently the primary meaning of the text.<ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801076005 \| last = Ramm \| first = Bernard \| title = Protestant Biblical Interpretation \| date = 1970 }} p.48 </ref> The [[Historical-grammatical method\|historical grammatical method]] is a [[Biblical hermeneutics\|hermeneutic]] technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words, but also the syntactical aspects, the cultural and historical background, and the literary genre.		There are two kinds of literal interpretation, letterism and the more common historical-grammatical method. Letterism attempts to uncover the meaning of the text through a strict emphasis upon a mechanical, wooden literalism of words. This approach often obscures the literary aspects and consequently the primary meaning of the text.<ref>Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801076005 \| last = Ramm \| first = Bernard \| title = Protestant Biblical Interpretation \| date = 1970 p.48 </ref> The [[Historical-grammatical method\|historical grammatical method]] is a [[Biblical hermeneutics\|hermeneutic]] technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words, but also the syntactical aspects, the cultural and historical background, and the literary genre.

	Fundamentalists and Evangelicals sometimes refer to themselves as "literalists" or Biblical literalists. Sociologists also use the term in reference to conservative Christian beliefs which include not just literalism but also inerrancy. Often the term Biblical literalism is used as a pejorative to describe or ridicule the interpretative approaches of fundamentalist or evangelical Christians.<ref>Laurence Wood, 'Theology as History and Hermeneutics', (2005)</ref><ref>George Regas, 'Take Another Look At Your Good Book', Los Angeles Times, February 3, 2000</ref><ref>Dhyanchand Carr, 'Christian Council of Asia: Partnership in Mission, Conference on World Mission and the Role of Korean Churches, November 1995</ref>		Fundamentalists and Evangelicals sometimes refer to themselves as "literalists" or Biblical literalists. Sociologists also use the term in reference to conservative Christian beliefs which include not just literalism but also inerrancy. Often the term Biblical literalism is used as a pejorative to describe or ridicule the interpretative approaches of fundamentalist or evangelical Christians.<ref>Laurence Wood, 'Theology as History and Hermeneutics', (2005)</ref><ref>George Regas, 'Take Another Look At Your Good Book', Los Angeles Times, February 3, 2000</ref><ref>Dhyanchand Carr, 'Christian Council of Asia: Partnership in Mission, Conference on World Mission and the Role of Korean Churches, November 1995</ref>

	== Clarity of Scripture ==		== Clarity of Scripture ==
	The vast majority of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians hold that scripture is [[Clarity of scripture\|perspicuous]], or that the basic meaning and teachings of Scripture are clear enough to be understood by the average person. It refers to the product (teachings of Scripture) rather than the process of interpretation itself ([[Exegesis]]). [[Martin Luther]] distinguished between external and internal aspects within the [[Clarity of scripture]]. External clarity concerns the principles of hermeneutics (including grammatical aspects) and guidance into understanding through the process of interpretation. The internal clarity concerns [[illumination]] of the believer - that is, guidance into understanding by the Holy Spirit.<ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = InterVarsity Press \| isbn = 0830828265 \| last = Osborne \| first = Grant R \| title = The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation \| date = 2006 }} p. 27</ref>		The vast majority of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians hold that scripture is [[Clarity of scripture\|perspicuous]], or that the basic meaning and teachings of Scripture are clear enough to be understood by the average person. It refers to the product (teachings of Scripture) rather than the process of interpretation itself ([[Exegesis]]). [[Martin Luther]] distinguished between external and internal aspects within the [[Clarity of scripture]]. External clarity concerns the principles of hermeneutics (including grammatical aspects) and guidance into understanding through the process of interpretation. The internal clarity concerns [[illumination]] of the believer - that is, guidance into understanding by the Holy Spirit.<ref>Cite book \| publisher = InterVarsity Press \| isbn = 0830828265 \| last = Osborne \| first = Grant R \| title = The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation \| date = 2006 p. 27</ref>

	So [[clarity of scripture]] does not mean that no interpretation principles are necessary, or that there is no cultural gap between Scripture and today. Instead [[exegesis]] and interpretation principles are utilized as part of the process to close the cultural gap in striving to understand. What the clarity of scripture does deny is that the Bible is a code to decipher, or that it cannot be understood apart from complex academic analysis as is typical in the [[Historical-critical method]] of interpretation.<ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = Victor Books \| isbn = 0896938190 \| pages = 324 \| last = Zuck \| first = Roy B \| title = Basic Bible Interpretation \| location = Wheaton, Ill \| date = 1991 }} p. 26</ref>		So [[clarity of scripture]] does not mean that no interpretation principles are necessary, or that there is no cultural gap between Scripture and today. Instead [[exegesis]] and interpretation principles are utilized as part of the process to close the cultural gap in striving to understand. What the clarity of scripture does deny is that the Bible is a code to decipher, or that it cannot be understood apart from complex academic analysis as is typical in the [[Historical-critical method]] of interpretation.<ref>Cite book \| publisher = Victor Books \| isbn = 0896938190 \| pages = 324 \| last = Zuck \| first = Roy B \| title = Basic Bible Interpretation \| location = Wheaton, Ill \| date = 1991 p. 26</ref>

	==Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical ==		==Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical ==

Nick at 07:29, 17 August 2009

2009-08-17T07:29:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:29, 17 August 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~us7wcw~~ <a ~~href~~="http://~~gtyrupfvcdcq~~.com/">~~gtyrupfvcdcq~~</a>, [~~url~~=http://~~wufyfmmgatps~~.com/]~~wufyfmmgatps~~[/~~url~~], [~~link~~=http://~~tofxcruauzfz~~.~~com~~/]~~tofxcruauzfz~~[~~/link~~], http://~~urqzyhfaaxps~~.~~com~~/		{{BibleRelated}}
			'''Biblical literalism''' (also called Biblicism or Biblical fundamentalism) is the interpretation or translation of the explicit and primary sense of words in the [[Bible]].<ref>''The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language'' Houghton Mifflin; 4 edition (September 14, 2000) defines literalism as "1. Adherence to the explicit sense of a given text or doctrine. 2. Literal portrayal; realism."</ref><ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801034132 \| last = Elwell \| first = Walter A. \| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology \| location = Grand Rapids, Mich. \| date = 1984 }} p. 643 </ref> A literal, Biblical interpretation is associated with the fundamentalist and evangelical [[hermeneutics\|hermeneutical]] approach to Scripture, and is used by most [[conservative Christianity\|conservative Christians]] today.<ref> [http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=97803346 ''Beyond Biblical Literalism and Inerrancy: Conservative Protestants and the Hermeneutic Interpretation of Scripture''], John Bartkowski, Sociology of Religion, 57, 1996. </ref> The essence of this approach focuses upon the author's intent as the primary meaning of the text.<ref name=elwell> [http://mb-soft.com/believe/txn/literali.htm ''Elwell Evangelical Dictionary''], Walter A. Elwell, Baker Publishing Group, May 1996, ISBN 0-8010-2049-2</ref> Literal interpretation does place emphasis upon the referential aspect of the words or terms in the text. It does not, however, mean a complete denial of literary aspects, genre, or figures of speech within the text (e.g., parable, allegory, simile, or metaphor).<ref>{{Cite book \| edition = Rev. and expanded \| publisher = Moody Press \| isbn = 0802421873 \| pages = 224 \| last = Ryrie \| first = Charles Caldwell \| title = Dispensationalism \| location = Chicago \| date = 1995 }} p. 81</ref> Also literalism does not necessarily lead to total and complete agreement upon one single interpretation for any given passage.

			There are two kinds of literal interpretation, letterism and the more common historical-grammatical method. Letterism attempts to uncover the meaning of the text through a strict emphasis upon a mechanical, wooden literalism of words. This approach often obscures the literary aspects and consequently the primary meaning of the text.<ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = Baker Book House \| isbn = 0801076005 \| last = Ramm \| first = Bernard \| title = Protestant Biblical Interpretation \| date = 1970 }} p.48 </ref> The [[Historical-grammatical method\|historical grammatical method]] is a [[Biblical hermeneutics\|hermeneutic]] technique that strives to uncover the meaning of the text by taking into account not just the grammatical words, but also the syntactical aspects, the cultural and historical background, and the literary genre.

			Fundamentalists and Evangelicals sometimes refer to themselves as "literalists" or Biblical literalists. Sociologists also use the term in reference to conservative Christian beliefs which include not just literalism but also inerrancy. Often the term Biblical literalism is used as a pejorative to describe or ridicule the interpretative approaches of fundamentalist or evangelical Christians.<ref>Laurence Wood, 'Theology as History and Hermeneutics', (2005)</ref><ref>George Regas, 'Take Another Look At Your Good Book', Los Angeles Times, February 3, 2000</ref><ref>Dhyanchand Carr, 'Christian Council of Asia: Partnership in Mission, Conference on World Mission and the Role of Korean Churches, November 1995</ref>

			== Clarity of Scripture ==
			The vast majority of evangelical and fundamentalist Christians hold that scripture is [[Clarity of scripture\|perspicuous]], or that the basic meaning and teachings of Scripture are clear enough to be understood by the average person. It refers to the product (teachings of Scripture) rather than the process of interpretation itself ([[Exegesis]]). [[Martin Luther]] distinguished between external and internal aspects within the [[Clarity of scripture]]. External clarity concerns the principles of hermeneutics (including grammatical aspects) and guidance into understanding through the process of interpretation. The internal clarity concerns [[illumination]] of the believer - that is, guidance into understanding by the Holy Spirit.<ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = InterVarsity Press \| isbn = 0830828265 \| last = Osborne \| first = Grant R \| title = The Hermeneutical Spiral: A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation \| date = 2006 }} p. 27</ref>

			So [[clarity of scripture]] does not mean that no interpretation principles are necessary, or that there is no cultural gap between Scripture and today. Instead [[exegesis]] and interpretation principles are utilized as part of the process to close the cultural gap in striving to understand. What the clarity of scripture does deny is that the Bible is a code to decipher, or that it cannot be understood apart from complex academic analysis as is typical in the [[Historical-critical method]] of interpretation.<ref>{{Cite book \| publisher = Victor Books \| isbn = 0896938190 \| pages = 324 \| last = Zuck \| first = Roy B \| title = Basic Bible Interpretation \| location = Wheaton, Ill \| date = 1991 }} p. 26</ref>

			==Literalism vs. Inerrancy and grammatical-historical ==

			Biblical literalists believe that, unless a passage is clearly intended as allegory, poetry, or some other genre, the Bible should be interpreted as literal statements by the author. [[Fundamentalists]] therefore treat as simple history such passages as the [[Creation according to Genesis]], the [[Deluge (mythology)\|Deluge]] and [[Noah's ark]], and the unnaturally long life-spans of the Patriarchs given in [[genealogies of Genesis]], as well as the strict historicity of the narrative accounts of [[Ancient Israel]], the [[supernatural]] interventions of [[God]] in history, and [[Miracles of Jesus\|Jesus' miracles]].<ref>[http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/pages/resources/publications/knowingDoing/2004/Miracles.pdf#search=%22miracles%20C.S.Lewis%22 ''Lewis on Miracles''], Art Lindsley, Knowing & Doing; A Teaching Quarterly for Discipleship of Heart and Mind:
			C.S. LEWIS INSTITUTE, Fall 2004</ref><ref>[http://www.icr.org/pdf/imp/imp-395.pdf#search=%22Genesis%20Flood%20Whitcomb%22 ''The History and Impact of the Book, The Genesis Flood''], John C. Whitcomb, Impact, Number 395, May 2006</ref>
			Literalism does not question that parables, metaphors and allegory exist in the Bible, but rather relies on contextual interpretations based on the author's intention.<ref name=Chicago>[http://www.bible-researcher.com/chicago2.html ''Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics With commentary by Norman L. Geisler''], Reproduced from ''Explaining Hermeneutics: A Commentary on the Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics'', Oakland, California: International Council on Biblical Inerrancy, 1983.</ref>

			As a part of ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy]]''<ref name=Chicago2>[http://www.spurgeon.org/~phil/creeds/chicago.htm ''The Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy''] (1997)</ref> conservative Christian scholarship affirms the following:

			{{quotation\|"WE AFFIRM the necessity of interpreting the Bible according to its literal, or normal, sense. The literal sense is the grammatical-historical sense, that is, the meaning which the writer expressed. Interpretation according to the literal sense will take account of all figures of speech and literary forms found in the text.

			WE DENY the legitimacy of any approach to Scripture that attributes to it meaning which the literal sense does not support."}}

			Noted inerrantist [[Norman Geisler]] in his commentary on the ''[[Chicago Statement on Biblical Hermeneutics]]'' states:

			{{quotation\|
			"The literal sense of Scripture is strongly affirmed here. To be sure the English word literal carries some problematic connotations with it. Hence the words normal and grammatical-historical are used to explain what is meant. The literal sense is also designated by the more descriptive title grammatical-historical sense. This means the correct interpretation is the one which discovers the meaning of the text in its grammatical forms and in the historical, cultural context in which the text is expressed." <ref name=Chicago/>}}

			== Pejorative use ==
			The term "Biblical Literalism" is often used pejoratively.

			[[Conrad Hyers]], professor of comparative religion at [[Gustavus Adolphus College]] in [[St. Peter, Minnesota]], criticized this as "a mentality [that] manifests itself [not] only in conservative churches, private-school enclaves, television programs of the evangelical right, and a considerable amount of Christian bookstore material; one often finds a literalist understanding of Bible and faith being assumed by those who have no religious inclinations, or who are avowedly antireligious in sentiment. Even in educated circles the possibility of more sophisticated theologies... is easily obscured by burning [[straw man\|straw effigies]] of biblical literalism."<ref>Hyers, Conrad [http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1332 "Biblical Literalism: Constricting the Cosmic Dance"], ''Christian Century'', August 4-11, 1982, p. 823.</ref>

			Steve Falkenberg, professor of religious psychology at [[Eastern Kentucky University]], says, "I've never met anyone who actually believes the Bible is literally true. I know a bunch of people who say they believe the Bible is literally true but nobody is actually a literalist. Taken literally, the Bible says the earth is flat and setting on pillars and cannot move (Ps 93:1, Ps 96:10, 1 Sam 2:8, Job 9:6). It says that great sea monsters are set to guard the edge of the sea (Job 41, Ps 104:26)..." <ref>Falkenberg, Steve [http://www.newreformation.org/literalism.htm ''Biblical Literalism''], ''New Reformation'', 2002. </ref>

			==References==


			==See also==
			*[[Biblical Hermeneutics]]
			*[[Biblical inerrancy]]
			*[[Exegesis]]
			*[[Historical-grammatical method]]
			*[[Science and the Bible]]
			*[[Textual criticism#Applications of textual_criticism \|Textual Criticism - Application]]

			[[Category:Pejoratives]]
			[[Category:Bible\|L]]
			[[Category:Christian theology of the Bible]]
			[[Category:Christianity-related controversies]]
			[[Category:Relevance fallacies]]
			[[Category:Christian fundamentalism]]
			[[Category:Creationist objections to evolution]]
			[[Category:Religion and science]]
			[[Category:Historical revisionism]]

123.124.217.89: lRPqtAJbaFekQO

2009-08-16T17:54:38Z

lRPqtAJbaFekQO

New page

us7wcw <a href="http://gtyrupfvcdcq.com/">gtyrupfvcdcq</a>, [url=http://wufyfmmgatps.com/]wufyfmmgatps[/url], [link=http://tofxcruauzfz.com/]tofxcruauzfz[/link], http://urqzyhfaaxps.com/

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:37, 11 March 2016
Line 53:		Line 53:
	[[Category:Religion and science]]		[[Category:Religion and science]]
	[[Category:Historical revisionism]]		[[Category:Historical revisionism]]

			{{Donate}}