Galatians 3:21 - Revision history

Textus Receptus: /* External Links */

2018-05-06T17:22:35Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 6 May 2018
Line 287:		Line 287:

	==External Links==		==External Links==
	* [http://www.standardbearers.net/uploads/Ahaziahs_Age_Upon_His_Accession_Chronology_of_the_OT_Dr_Floyd_Nolen_Jones_PhD_ThD.pdf Ahaziahs Age Upon His Accession Chronology of the OT] by Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones
			{{Donate}}

Beza 1598 at 15:19, 12 March 2017

2017-03-12T15:19:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:19, 12 March 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	*'''[[Galatians 3:21 ~~(TRV)~~\|Galatians 3:21]]''' Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! Because, if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.		*'''[[Galatians 3:21 King James Version 2016\|Galatians 3:21]]''' Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! Because, if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.

	{{~~Progressive~~ King James Version}}		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

Beza 1598 at 15:53, 9 January 2017

2017-01-09T15:53:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:53, 9 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	*'''[[Galatians 3:21 (TRV)\|Galatians 3:21]]'''		*'''[[Galatians 3:21 (TRV)\|Galatians 3:21]]''' Is the law then against the promises of God? Certainly not! Because, if there had been a law given which could have given life, truly righteousness would have been by the law.

	{{Progressive King James Version}}		{{Progressive King James Version}}

Beza 1598: /* Foreign Language Versions */

2016-11-13T14:16:35Z

Foreign Language Versions

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 13 November 2016
Line 196:		Line 196:

	====[[Arabic]]====		====[[Arabic]]====
	* <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)		* فهل الناموس ضد مواعيد الله. حاشا. لانه لو أعطي ناموس قادر ان يحيي لكان بالحقيقة البر بالناموس. <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

	====[[Aramaic]]====		====[[Aramaic]]====
Line 203:		Line 203:
	====[[Basque]]====		====[[Basque]]====

	*		* Leguea beraz Iaincoaren promessén contra eratchequi içan da? Guertha eztadila. Ecen eman içan baliz Leguea ceinec viuifica ahal leçan, segur Leguetic liçate iustitiá.

	====[[Bulgarian]]====		====[[Bulgarian]]====
Line 211:		Line 211:
	====[[Chinese]]====		====[[Chinese]]====

	* 1 (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))		* 1 这样，律法是与神的应许反对麽？断乎不是！若曾传一个能叫人得生的律法，义就诚然本乎律法了。 (Chinese Union Version (Simplified))

	* 1 (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))		* 1 這樣，律法是與神的應許反對麼？斷乎不是！若曾傳一個能叫人得生的律法，義就誠然本乎律法了。 (Chinese Union Version (Traditional))

	====[[French]]====		====[[French]]====

	* (French Darby)		* La loi est-elle donc contre les promesses de Dieu? Qu'ainsi n'advienne! Car s'il avait ete donne une loi qui eut le pouvoir de faire vivre, la justice serait en realite sur le principe de la loi. (French Darby)

	* [[1744 AD\|1744]] (Martin 1744)		* [[1744 AD\|1744]] La Loi donc [a-t-elle été ajoutée] contre les promesses de Dieu? nullement. Car si la Loi eût été donnée pour pouvoir vivifier, véritablement la justice serait de la Loi. (Martin 1744)

	* [[1744 AD\|1744]] (Ostervald 1744)		* [[1744 AD\|1744]] (Ostervald 1744)
Line 229:		Line 229:
	* [[1871 AD\|1871]] (Elberfelder 1871)		* [[1871 AD\|1871]] (Elberfelder 1871)

	* [[1912 AD\|1912]] (Luther 1912)		* [[1912 AD\|1912]] Wie? Ist denn das Gesetz wider Gottes Verheißungen? Das sei ferne! Wenn aber ein Gesetz gegeben wäre, das da könnte lebendig machen, so käme die Gerechtigkeit wahrhaftig aus dem Gesetz. (Luther 1912)

	====[[Italian]]====		====[[Italian]]====

	* [[1649 AD\|1649]] (Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)		* [[1649 AD\|1649]] La legge è ella dunque stata data contro alle promesse di Dio? Così non sia; perciocchè, se fosse stata data la legge, che potesse vivificare, veramente la giustizia sarebbe per la legge. (Giovanni Diodati Bible 1649)

	* [[1927 AD\|1927]] (Riveduta Bible 1927)		* [[1927 AD\|1927]] La legge è essa dunque contraria alle promesse di Dio? Così non sia; perché se fosse stata data una legge capace di produrre la vita, allora sì, la giustizia sarebbe venuta dalla legge; (Riveduta Bible 1927)

	====[[Japanese]]====		====[[Japanese]]====
Line 243:		Line 243:
	====[[Latin]]====		====[[Latin]]====

	* [[Latin Vulgate]]		* lex ergo adversus promissa Dei absit si enim data esset lex quae posset vivificare vere ex lege esset iustitia [[Latin Vulgate]]

	* [[1527 AD\|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)		* [[1527 AD\|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)
Line 259:		Line 259:
	====[[Russian]]====		====[[Russian]]====

	* [[1876 AD\|1876]] [[Russian Synodal Version]]		* [[1876 AD\|1876]] Итак закон противен обетованиям Божиим? Никак! Ибоесли бы дан был закон, могущий животворить, то подлинно праведность была бы от закона; [[Russian Synodal Version]]

	Phonetically:		Phonetically:
Line 269:		Line 269:
	====[[Swedish]]====		====[[Swedish]]====

	* [[1917 AD\|1917]] (Swedish - Svenska 1917)		* [[1917 AD\|1917]] Är då lagen emot Guds löften? Bort det! Om en lag hade blivit given, som kunde göra levande, då skulle rättfärdigheten verkligen komma av lagen. (Swedish - Svenska 1917)

	====[[Tagalog]]====		====[[Tagalog]]====

	* [[1905 AD\|1905]] (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)		* [[1905 AD\|1905]] Ang kautusan nga baga ay laban sa mga pangako ng Dios? Huwag nawang mangyari: sapagka't kung ibinigay sana ang isang kautusang may kapangyarihang magbigay buhay, tunay ngang ang katuwiran sana ay naging dahil sa kautusan. (Ang Dating Biblia 1905)

	====[[Tok Pisin]]====		====[[Tok Pisin]]====
Line 281:		Line 281:
	====[[Vietnamese]]====		====[[Vietnamese]]====

	* [[1934 AD\|1934]] (VIET)		* [[1934 AD\|1934]] Vậy thì luật pháp nghịch cùng lời hứa của Ðức Chúa Trời hay sao? chẳng hề như vậy; vì nếu đã ban cho một luật pháp có thể làm cho sống, thì sự công bình chắc bởi luật pháp mà đến. (VIET)

	==See Also==		==See Also==

Beza 1598 at 13:46, 13 November 2016

2016-11-13T13:46:28Z

Show changes

Textus Receptus: New page: '''Galatians 3:21''' Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by t...

2011-02-09T06:05:38Z

New page: '''Galatians 3:21''' Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by t...

New page

'''Galatians 3:21''' Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.