Johannine Comma and Lorenzo Valla - Revision history

Nick at 13:00, 21 August 2021

2021-08-21T13:00:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:00, 21 August 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:
	The Greeks used the Donation of Constantine also [http://www.academia.edu/5615405/The_Donation_of_Constantine_and_the_Church_in_Late_Byzantium], and never doubted the genuineness of the Donation of Constantine which basically states 1 John 5:7. This begs the question: if a false document was made to be presented as real, using a verse known to be false would have been an obvious clue that the document was a fraud. Rather the opposite is true here it is accepted by all as fact. The Greeks knew of 1 John 5:7 and never registered a complaint regarding the verse and had no objections to it being authentic until completely proven otherwise. If 1 John 5:7 was apocryphal, Greeks not have so readily accepted this document. Greeks never objected to 1 John 5:7; all such objections to came from Westerners studying the Greek.		The Greeks used the Donation of Constantine also [http://www.academia.edu/5615405/The_Donation_of_Constantine_and_the_Church_in_Late_Byzantium], and never doubted the genuineness of the Donation of Constantine which basically states 1 John 5:7. This begs the question: if a false document was made to be presented as real, using a verse known to be false would have been an obvious clue that the document was a fraud. Rather the opposite is true here it is accepted by all as fact. The Greeks knew of 1 John 5:7 and never registered a complaint regarding the verse and had no objections to it being authentic until completely proven otherwise. If 1 John 5:7 was apocryphal, Greeks not have so readily accepted this document. Greeks never objected to 1 John 5:7; all such objections to came from Westerners studying the Greek.

	[[Category: Omissions that effect the ~~diety~~ of Christ]]		[[Category: Omissions that effect the deity of Christ]]
	[[Category:Trinitarianism]]		[[Category:Trinitarianism]]
	[[Category:Comma Johanneum]]		[[Category:Comma Johanneum]]

Nick at 02:17, 24 June 2020

2020-06-24T02:17:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:17, 24 June 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:
	The Greeks used the Donation of Constantine also [http://www.academia.edu/5615405/The_Donation_of_Constantine_and_the_Church_in_Late_Byzantium], and never doubted the genuineness of the Donation of Constantine which basically states 1 John 5:7. This begs the question: if a false document was made to be presented as real, using a verse known to be false would have been an obvious clue that the document was a fraud. Rather the opposite is true here it is accepted by all as fact. The Greeks knew of 1 John 5:7 and never registered a complaint regarding the verse and had no objections to it being authentic until completely proven otherwise. If 1 John 5:7 was apocryphal, Greeks not have so readily accepted this document. Greeks never objected to 1 John 5:7; all such objections to came from Westerners studying the Greek.		The Greeks used the Donation of Constantine also [http://www.academia.edu/5615405/The_Donation_of_Constantine_and_the_Church_in_Late_Byzantium], and never doubted the genuineness of the Donation of Constantine which basically states 1 John 5:7. This begs the question: if a false document was made to be presented as real, using a verse known to be false would have been an obvious clue that the document was a fraud. Rather the opposite is true here it is accepted by all as fact. The Greeks knew of 1 John 5:7 and never registered a complaint regarding the verse and had no objections to it being authentic until completely proven otherwise. If 1 John 5:7 was apocryphal, Greeks not have so readily accepted this document. Greeks never objected to 1 John 5:7; all such objections to came from Westerners studying the Greek.

			[[Category: Omissions that effect the diety of Christ]]
			[[Category:Trinitarianism]]
			[[Category:Comma Johanneum]]
			[[Category:Johannine Comma]]

			{{Article Index Johannine Comma}}
	{{Donate}}		{{Donate}}

Nick: New page: ====Donation of Constantine==== The Donation of Constantine was believed to be Genuine for hundreds of years (approximately 600 years from the 8th to the 15th Century.) It was admitted...

2020-06-24T02:15:54Z

New page: ====Donation of Constantine==== The Donation of Constantine was believed to be Genuine for hundreds of years (approximately 600 years from the 8th to the 15th Century.) It was admitted...

New page

====Donation of Constantine====
The [[Donation of Constantine]] was believed to be Genuine for hundreds of years (approximately 600 years from the 8th to the 15th Century.) It was admitted as a forgery in the 15th Century by Rome after [[Lorenzo Valla]], a post humorous mentor of [[Erasmus]], wrote ''De falso credita et ementita Constantini Donatione declamatio'' which analyzed the document known as the Constitutum Constantini (or "donatio Constantini" as he refers to it in his writings), or the Donation of Constantine. The Donation of Constantine basically reiterates 1 John 5:7:

:"...has taught us, in God the Father, the almighty maker of Heaven and earth, of all things visible and invisible; and in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord God, through whom all things are created; and in the Holy Spirit, the Lord and vivifier of the whole creature. We confess these, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, in such way that, in the perfect Trinity, there shall also be a fulness of divinity and a unity of power. The Father is God, the Son is God, and the Holy Spirit is God; and '''<u>these three are one</u>''' in Jesus Christ." [https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/donatconst.asp]

The Greeks used the Donation of Constantine also [http://www.academia.edu/5615405/The_Donation_of_Constantine_and_the_Church_in_Late_Byzantium], and never doubted the genuineness of the Donation of Constantine which basically states 1 John 5:7. This begs the question: if a false document was made to be presented as real, using a verse known to be false would have been an obvious clue that the document was a fraud. Rather the opposite is true here it is accepted by all as fact. The Greeks knew of 1 John 5:7 and never registered a complaint regarding the verse and had no objections to it being authentic until completely proven otherwise. If 1 John 5:7 was apocryphal, Greeks not have so readily accepted this document. Greeks never objected to 1 John 5:7; all such objections to came from Westerners studying the Greek.

{{Donate}}