Philippians 2:6 - Revision history

Nick: /* New King James Version 1979 Error */

2024-12-31T10:08:40Z

New King James Version 1979 Error

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:08, 31 December 2024
Line 22:		Line 22:

	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])		* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])
	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''. ([[NKJV ~~1979~~]])		* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''. ([[NKJV]] 1979)
	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider it robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. (NKJV 1984)		* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider it robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. (NKJV 1984)

Nick: /* Commentary */

2024-12-31T10:07:04Z

Commentary

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:07, 31 December 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:

	==Commentary==		==Commentary==
	===New King James Version Error===		===New King James Version 1979 Error===
			The 1979 Edition had this reading and then they changed it to be more like the KJV in latter NKJV editions. The 1979 reading followed other modern versions and is a blasphemous reading. This is an interesting thing, because many are saying the NKJV is correct in many places that TR/KJV folks have pointed out over the years, and we have expressed our concerns, but it seems some of these places have been mopped up in the latter editions.

	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])		* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])
	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''. ([[NKJV]])		* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''. ([[NKJV 1979]])
			* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider it robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. (NKJV 1984)

	Jesus was saying he was God the I AM and they were going to stone him for it. That sounds like he ''did'' consider equality with God something to be grasped! The Pharisees even responded by saying, "For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, '''<u>makest thyself God</u>'''." (John 10:30) Earlier in John, it says: "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but '''<u>said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.</u>'''" (John 5:18). But the NKJV ~~says~~ falsely says that "He did not consider '''<u>equality</u>''' with God something to be grasped!" In fact the NKJV ~~says~~ the opposite in this verse than the KJV. This is an obvious false doctrine!		Jesus was saying he was God the I AM and they were going to stone him for it. That sounds like he ''did'' consider equality with God something to be grasped! The Pharisees even responded by saying, "For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, '''<u>makest thyself God</u>'''." (John 10:30) Earlier in John, it says: "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but '''<u>said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.</u>'''" (John 5:18). But the NKJV 1979 said falsely says that "He did not consider '''<u>equality</u>''' with God something to be grasped!" In fact the NKJV 1979 said the opposite in this verse than the KJV. This is an obvious false doctrine!

	John Chrysostom was clear that the concept of the NKJV is exactly what he was arguing against, and that it was an Arian concept:		John Chrysostom was clear that the concept of the 1979 NKJV was exactly what he was arguing against, and that it was an Arian concept:
	:"What shall we say against Arius, who asserts the Son is of a different substance? Tell me now, what means, 'He took the form of a servant?' It means, He became man. Wherefore 'being in the form of God,' He was God. For one 'form' and another 'form' is named; if the one be true, the other is also. 'The form of a servant' means, Man by nature, wherefore 'the form of God' means, God by nature. And he not only bears record of this, but of His equality too, as John also doth, that he is no way inferior to the Father, for he saith, '''<u>"He thought it not a thing to seize, to be equal with God."</u>''' Now what is their wise reasoning? '''<u>"Nay," -- say they -- "he proves the very contrary; for he says that, being in the form of God, He seized not equality with God.</u>'''" John Crysostom, Homily 6, Philippians 2:5-8		:"What shall we say against Arius, who asserts the Son is of a different substance? Tell me now, what means, 'He took the form of a servant?' It means, He became man. Wherefore 'being in the form of God,' He was God. For one 'form' and another 'form' is named; if the one be true, the other is also. 'The form of a servant' means, Man by nature, wherefore 'the form of God' means, God by nature. And he not only bears record of this, but of His equality too, as John also doth, that he is no way inferior to the Father, for he saith, '''<u>"He thought it not a thing to seize, to be equal with God."</u>''' Now what is their wise reasoning? '''<u>"Nay," -- say they -- "he proves the very contrary; for he says that, being in the form of God, He seized not equality with God.</u>'''" John Crysostom, Homily 6, Philippians 2:5-8

	So in other words, the Arians were denying the deity of Christ with the very words of the NKJV!		So in other words, the Arians were denying the deity of Christ with the very words of the NKJV 1979!

	The Greek word for ''robbery'' is ''ἁρπαγμός'' (arpagmos). In the Greek text of Philippians 2:6, this word is a noun. ''arpagmos'' means ''robbery'', and is related to the word ''harpadzo'' ''snatching''/''rapture'', etc. The KJV translates this Greek noun as a noun, "robbery." The NKJV ''~~changes~~'' this Greek noun into a verb, "to be grasped." The KJV follows the Greek perfectly, but the NKJV ~~morphs~~ and ~~changes~~ it drasticly. Jesus DID in fact claim diety: All men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father." (John 5:23)		The Greek word for ''robbery'' is ''ἁρπαγμός'' (arpagmos). In the Greek text of Philippians 2:6, this word is a noun. ''arpagmos'' means ''robbery'', and is related to the word ''harpadzo'' ''snatching''/''rapture'', etc. The KJV translates this Greek noun as a noun, "robbery." The NKJV 1979 ''changed'' this Greek noun into a verb, "to be grasped." The KJV follows the Greek perfectly, but the NKJV 1979 morphed and changed it drasticly. Jesus DID in fact claim diety: All men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father." ([[John 5:23]])

	Chrysostom went on so say it was a pagan concept from Arius :		Chrysostom went on so say it was a pagan concept from Arius :

Nick at 12:31, 30 December 2024

2024-12-30T12:31:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 30 December 2024
Line 64:		Line 64:
	* [[1546 AD\|1546]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 1st)		* [[1546 AD\|1546]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 1st)
	* [[1549 AD\|1549]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 2nd)		* [[1549 AD\|1549]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 2nd)
	* [[1550 AD\|1550]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 3rd - [[Editio Regia]])		* [[1550 AD\|1550]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 3rd - [[Editio Regia]])
	* [[1551 AD\|1551]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 4th)		* [[1551 AD\|1551]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 4th)

	====[[Theodore Beza]]====		====[[Theodore Beza]]====
Line 91:		Line 91:
	====Scrivener====		====Scrivener====

	* [[1894 AD\|1894]] ~~(? ????? ???T???)~~		* [[1894 AD\|1894]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων, οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ,

	====Other Greek====		====Other Greek====

	* [[1857 AD\|1857]] (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)		* [[1857 AD\|1857]] (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
	* (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)		* [[1872 AD\|1872]] ὅς ἐν μορφή θεός ὑπάρχω οὐ ἁρπαγμός ἡγέομαι ὁ εἰμί ἴσος θεός (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
	* [[1881 AD\|1881]] (Westcott & Hort)		* [[1881 AD\|1881]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ, (Westcott & Hort)
	* (Greek orthodox Church)		* [[1904 AD\|1904]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ, (Greek orthodox Church)
			* [[1904 AD\|1904]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ, (Nestle)

	==Anglo Saxon Translations==		==Anglo Saxon Translations==
Line 108:		Line 109:
	==English Translations==		==English Translations==

	* [[~~1380~~ AD\|~~1380~~]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1382 AD\|1382]] that whanne he was in the forme of God, demyde not raueyn, that hym silf were euene to God; ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])

	* [[1395 AD\|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1395 AD\|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])

	* [[1534 AD\|1534]] ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])		* [[1534 AD\|1534]] Which beynge in the shape of god and thought it not robbery to be equall with god. ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])

	* [[1535 AD\|1535]] (Coverdale Bible)		* [[1535 AD\|1535]] which beyinge in the shappe of God, thought it not robbery to be equall with God, (Coverdale Bible)

	* [[1539 AD\|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])		* [[1537 AD\|1537]] Whiche beinge in the shap of God, and thought it not robbery to be equal wt God.

			* [[1539 AD\|1539]] which whan he was in the shape of God, thought it no robbery to be equall with God ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])

	* [[1540 AD\|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])		* [[1540 AD\|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
Line 124:		Line 127:
	* [[1557 AD\|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD\|1557]])		* [[1557 AD\|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD\|1557]])

	* [[1560 AD\|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition		* [[1560 AD\|1560]] Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God: ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition

	* [[1568 AD\|1568]] ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition		* [[1568 AD\|1568]] Who beyng in the fourme of God, thought it not robbery to be equall with God. ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition

	* [[1582 AD\|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD\|1582]])		* [[1582 AD\|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD\|1582]])
Line 132:		Line 135:
	* [[1587 AD\|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]		* [[1587 AD\|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]

	* [[1599 AD\|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]		* [[1599 AD\|1599]] Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God: ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]

	* [[1611 AD\|1611]] ([[King James Version]])		* [[1611 AD\|1611]] ([[King James Version]])
Line 150:		Line 153:
	* [[1795 AD\|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)		* [[1795 AD\|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)

	* [[1833 AD\|1833]] (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])		* [[1833 AD\|1833]] Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])

	* [[1835 AD\|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)		* [[1835 AD\|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)

Nick at 12:20, 30 December 2024

2024-12-30T12:20:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:20, 30 December 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Verses in Philippians 2}}		{{Verses in Philippians 2}}

			<center><< - [[Philippians 2:5]] - [[Philippians 2:7]] - >></center>

	* '''[[Philippians 2:6 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΦΙΛΙΠΠΗΣΙΟΥΣ 2:6]]''' [[3739\|ὃς]] [[1722\|ἐν]] [[3444\|μορφῇ]] [[2316\|Θεοῦ]] [[5225\|ὑπάρχων,]] [[3756\|οὐχ]] [[725\|ἁρπαγμὸν]] [[2233\|ἡγήσατο]] [[3588\|τὸ]] [[1511\|εἶναι]] [[2470\|ἴσα]] [[2316\|Θεῷ,]]		* '''[[Philippians 2:6 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΦΙΛΙΠΠΗΣΙΟΥΣ 2:6]]''' [[3739\|ὃς]] [[1722\|ἐν]] [[3444\|μορφῇ]] [[2316\|Θεοῦ]] [[5225\|ὑπάρχων,]] [[3756\|οὐχ]] [[725\|ἁρπαγμὸν]] [[2233\|ἡγήσατο]] [[3588\|τὸ]] [[1511\|εἶναι]] [[2470\|ἴσα]] [[2316\|Θεῷ,]]

	{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}		{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}

	* ''' Philippians 2:6 ''' Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God:		* ''' Philippians 2:6 ''' [[3739\|Who]], [[5225\|being]] [[1722\|in]] [[3444\|the form]] [[2316\|of God]], [[2233\|thought]] [[3756\|it not]] [[725\|robbery]] [[1511\|to be]] [[2470\|equal]] [[2316\|with God]]:

	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	*'''[[Philippians 2:6 King James Version 2016\|Philippians 2:6]]''' who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God,		*'''[[Philippians 2:6 King James Version 2016\|Philippians 2:6]]''' [[3739\|who]],[[5225\|being]] [[1722\|in]] [[3444\|the form]] [[2316\|of God]], [[3756\|did not]] [[2233\|consider]] [[3756\|it]] [[725\|robbery]] [[1511\|to be]] [[2470\|equal]] [[2316\|with God]],

	{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

Nick: /* New King James Version */

2024-12-30T10:36:34Z

New King James Version

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 30 December 2024
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==Commentary==		==Commentary==
	===New King James Version===		===New King James Version Error===

	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])		* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])

Nick: /* Commentary */

2024-12-30T10:36:09Z

Commentary

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:36, 30 December 2024
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==Commentary==		==Commentary==
	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''.		===New King James Version===
	* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''.
			* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''. ([[KJV]])
			* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''. ([[NKJV]])

	Jesus was saying he was God the I AM and they were going to stone him for it. That sounds like he ''did'' consider equality with God something to be grasped! The Pharisees even responded by saying, "For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, '''<u>makest thyself God</u>'''." (John 10:30) Earlier in John, it says: "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but '''<u>said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.</u>'''" (John 5:18). But the NKJV says falsely says that "He did not consider '''<u>equality</u>''' with God something to be grasped!" In fact the NKJV says the opposite in this verse than the KJV. This is an obvious false doctrine!		Jesus was saying he was God the I AM and they were going to stone him for it. That sounds like he ''did'' consider equality with God something to be grasped! The Pharisees even responded by saying, "For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, '''<u>makest thyself God</u>'''." (John 10:30) Earlier in John, it says: "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but '''<u>said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.</u>'''" (John 5:18). But the NKJV says falsely says that "He did not consider '''<u>equality</u>''' with God something to be grasped!" In fact the NKJV says the opposite in this verse than the KJV. This is an obvious false doctrine!

Nick: /* Commentary */

2024-12-30T10:35:28Z

Commentary

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 30 December 2024
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==Commentary==		==Commentary==
			* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>thought it not robbery to be equal with God</u>'''.
			* Who, being in the form of God, '''<u>did not consider equality with God something to be grasped</u>'''.

			Jesus was saying he was God the I AM and they were going to stone him for it. That sounds like he ''did'' consider equality with God something to be grasped! The Pharisees even responded by saying, "For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, '''<u>makest thyself God</u>'''." (John 10:30) Earlier in John, it says: "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he not only had broken the sabbath, but '''<u>said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God.</u>'''" (John 5:18). But the NKJV says falsely says that "He did not consider '''<u>equality</u>''' with God something to be grasped!" In fact the NKJV says the opposite in this verse than the KJV. This is an obvious false doctrine!

			John Chrysostom was clear that the concept of the NKJV is exactly what he was arguing against, and that it was an Arian concept:
			:"What shall we say against Arius, who asserts the Son is of a different substance? Tell me now, what means, 'He took the form of a servant?' It means, He became man. Wherefore 'being in the form of God,' He was God. For one 'form' and another 'form' is named; if the one be true, the other is also. 'The form of a servant' means, Man by nature, wherefore 'the form of God' means, God by nature. And he not only bears record of this, but of His equality too, as John also doth, that he is no way inferior to the Father, for he saith, '''<u>"He thought it not a thing to seize, to be equal with God."</u>''' Now what is their wise reasoning? '''<u>"Nay," -- say they -- "he proves the very contrary; for he says that, being in the form of God, He seized not equality with God.</u>'''" John Crysostom, Homily 6, Philippians 2:5-8

			So in other words, the Arians were denying the deity of Christ with the very words of the NKJV!

			The Greek word for ''robbery'' is ''ἁρπαγμός'' (arpagmos). In the Greek text of Philippians 2:6, this word is a noun. ''arpagmos'' means ''robbery'', and is related to the word ''harpadzo'' ''snatching''/''rapture'', etc. The KJV translates this Greek noun as a noun, "robbery." The NKJV ''changes'' this Greek noun into a verb, "to be grasped." The KJV follows the Greek perfectly, but the NKJV morphs and changes it drasticly. Jesus DID in fact claim diety: All men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father." (John 5:23)

			Chrysostom went on so say it was a pagan concept from Arius :
			:"'''<u>No, say they, but he means that being a little God, he seized not upon being equal to the great God</u>''', who was greater than he. Is there a great and a little God? And do ye bring in the '''<u>doctrines of the Greeks</u>''' upon those of the Church?" John Crysostom, Homily 6,

			Philippians 2:5-8

			John Gill agreed:
			:
			"...as for the sense which some put upon the words, that he did not "affect", or "greedily catch" at deity; '''<u>as the phrase will not admit of it, so it is not true in fact; he did affect deity, and asserted it strongly, and took every proper opportunity of declaring it</u>''', and in express terms affirmed he was the Son of God; '''<u>and in terms easy to be understood declared his proper deity, and his unity and equality with the Father; required the same faith in himself as in the Father</u>''', and signified that he that saw the one, saw the other..." ''John Gill'', Commentary

	==Greek==		==Greek==

Textus Receptus: /* External Links */

2018-05-17T17:25:24Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:25, 17 May 2018
Line 289:		Line 289:

	* [http://www.lamblion.net/Articles/ScottJones/indictment_of_ignorance.htm Indictment of Ignorance] by [[Scott Jones]]		* [http://www.lamblion.net/Articles/ScottJones/indictment_of_ignorance.htm Indictment of Ignorance] by [[Scott Jones]]


			{{Donate}}

Beza 1598 at 08:45, 16 March 2017

2017-03-16T08:45:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 16 March 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	*'''[[Philippians 2:6 ~~(TRV)~~\|Philippians 2:6]]''' who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God,		*'''[[Philippians 2:6 King James Version 2016\|Philippians 2:6]]''' who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God,

	{{~~Progressive~~ King James Version}}		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

Beza 1598 at 16:15, 10 January 2017

2017-01-10T16:15:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 10 January 2017
Line 8:		Line 8:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	*'''[[Philippians 2:6 (TRV)\|Philippians 2:6]]'''		*'''[[Philippians 2:6 (TRV)\|Philippians 2:6]]''' who, being in the form of God, did not consider it robbery to be equal with God,

	{{Progressive King James Version}}		{{Progressive King James Version}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 30 December 2024
Line 64:		Line 64:
	* [[1546 AD\|1546]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 1st)		* [[1546 AD\|1546]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 1st)
	* [[1549 AD\|1549]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 2nd)		* [[1549 AD\|1549]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 2nd)
	* [[1550 AD\|1550]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 3rd - [[Editio Regia]])		* [[1550 AD\|1550]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 3rd - [[Editio Regia]])
	* [[1551 AD\|1551]] ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 4th)		* [[1551 AD\|1551]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ ([[Robert Estienne]] (Stephanus) 4th)

	====[[Theodore Beza]]====		====[[Theodore Beza]]====
Line 91:		Line 91:
	====Scrivener====		====Scrivener====

	* [[1894 AD\|1894]] ~~(? ????? ???T???)~~		* [[1894 AD\|1894]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων, οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ,

	====Other Greek====		====Other Greek====

	* [[1857 AD\|1857]] (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)		* [[1857 AD\|1857]] (Tregelles' Greek New Testament)
	* (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)		* [[1872 AD\|1872]] ὅς ἐν μορφή θεός ὑπάρχω οὐ ἁρπαγμός ἡγέομαι ὁ εἰμί ἴσος θεός (Tischendorf 8th Ed.)
	* [[1881 AD\|1881]] (Westcott & Hort)		* [[1881 AD\|1881]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα θεῷ, (Westcott & Hort)
	* (Greek orthodox Church)		* [[1904 AD\|1904]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ, (Greek orthodox Church)
			* [[1904 AD\|1904]] ὃς ἐν μορφῇ Θεοῦ ὑπάρχων οὐχ ἁρπαγμὸν ἡγήσατο τὸ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ, (Nestle)

	==Anglo Saxon Translations==		==Anglo Saxon Translations==
Line 108:		Line 109:
	==English Translations==		==English Translations==

	* [[~~1380~~ AD\|~~1380~~]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1382 AD\|1382]] that whanne he was in the forme of God, demyde not raueyn, that hym silf were euene to God; ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])

	* [[1395 AD\|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])		* [[1395 AD\|1395]] ([[Wyclif's Bible]] by [[John Wycliffe]])

	* [[1534 AD\|1534]] ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])		* [[1534 AD\|1534]] Which beynge in the shape of god and thought it not robbery to be equall with god. ([[Tyndale Bible]] by [[William Tyndale]])

	* [[1535 AD\|1535]] (Coverdale Bible)		* [[1535 AD\|1535]] which beyinge in the shappe of God, thought it not robbery to be equall with God, (Coverdale Bible)

	* [[1539 AD\|1539]] ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])		* [[1537 AD\|1537]] Whiche beinge in the shap of God, and thought it not robbery to be equal wt God.

			* [[1539 AD\|1539]] which whan he was in the shape of God, thought it no robbery to be equall with God ([[Great Bible]] First Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])

	* [[1540 AD\|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])		* [[1540 AD\|1540]] ([[Great Bible]] Second Edition - [[Miles Coverdale]])
Line 124:		Line 127:
	* [[1557 AD\|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD\|1557]])		* [[1557 AD\|1557]] (Geneva [[1557 AD\|1557]])

	* [[1560 AD\|1560]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition		* [[1560 AD\|1560]] Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God: ([[Geneva Bible]]) First Edition

	* [[1568 AD\|1568]] ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition		* [[1568 AD\|1568]] Who beyng in the fourme of God, thought it not robbery to be equall with God. ([[Bishop's Bible]] First Edition

	* [[1582 AD\|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD\|1582]])		* [[1582 AD\|1582]] (Rheims [[1582 AD\|1582]])
Line 132:		Line 135:
	* [[1587 AD\|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]		* [[1587 AD\|1587]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]

	* [[1599 AD\|1599]] ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]		* [[1599 AD\|1599]] Who being in ye forme of God, thought it no robberie to be equall with God: ([[Geneva Bible]]) by [[William Whittingham]]

	* [[1611 AD\|1611]] ([[King James Version]])		* [[1611 AD\|1611]] ([[King James Version]])
Line 150:		Line 153:
	* [[1795 AD\|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)		* [[1795 AD\|1795]] (A Translation of the New Testament from the Original Greek by Thomas Haweis)

	* [[1833 AD\|1833]] (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])		* [[1833 AD\|1833]] Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: (Webster Version - by [[Noah Webster]])

	* [[1835 AD\|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)		* [[1835 AD\|1835]] (Living Oracles by Alexander Campbell)