Revelation 22:19 - Revision history

Nick: /* Bohairic Coptic */

2023-05-07T09:51:57Z

Bohairic Coptic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:51, 7 May 2023
Line 125:		Line 125:

	:''ibid''. ''του ξυλου pro βίβλου'' sec. א‎AB and most (with ''sah'') but		:''ibid''. ''του ξυλου pro βίβλου'' sec. א‎AB and most (with ''sah'') but
	:''copt'' holds to “book” (πϫωμ) with ''textus receptus'' and		::''copt'' holds to “book” (πϫωμ) with ''textus receptus'' and
	:exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.		::exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.
	:Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''		::Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''
	:and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes ϢΗΝ not		::and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes ϢΗΝ not
	:ϢΕ = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.		::ϢΕ = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.

	(''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924029295165/page/n109/mode/2up Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version]'' - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)		(''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924029295165/page/n109/mode/2up Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version]'' - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)

Nick: /* Bohairic Coptic */

2023-05-07T09:44:53Z

Bohairic Coptic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:44, 7 May 2023
Line 131:		Line 131:
	:ϢΕ = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.		:ϢΕ = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.

	(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)		(''[https://archive.org/details/cu31924029295165/page/n109/mode/2up Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version]'' - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)

	====Latin Vulgate====		====Latin Vulgate====

Nick: /* Bohairic Coptic */

2023-05-07T09:42:34Z

Bohairic Coptic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:42, 7 May 2023
Line 128:		Line 128:
	:exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.		:exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.
	:Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''		:Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''
	:and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes ~~---~~ not		:and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes ϢΗΝ not
	:-- = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.		:ϢΕ = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.

	(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)		(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)

Nick: /* Bohairic Coptic */

2023-05-07T09:39:26Z

Bohairic Coptic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 7 May 2023
Line 127:		Line 127:
	:''copt'' holds to “book” (πϫωμ) with ''textus receptus'' and		:''copt'' holds to “book” (πϫωμ) with ''textus receptus'' and
	:exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.		:exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.
	Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''		:Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''
	and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes --- not		:and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes --- not
	-- = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.		:-- = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.

	(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)		(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)

Nick: /* Bohairic Coptic */

2023-05-07T09:39:07Z

Bohairic Coptic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 7 May 2023
Line 124:		Line 124:
	Bohairic Coptic mss contain the word book. Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version, by H. C. Hoskier in 1911, has:		Bohairic Coptic mss contain the word book. Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version, by H. C. Hoskier in 1911, has:

	ibid~~, tov £v\ov~~ pro ~~/3i/3\ov~~ sec. ~~NAB~~ and most (with sah) but		:''ibid''. ''του ξυλου pro βίβλου'' sec. א‎AB and most (with ''sah'') but
	copt holds to ~~" book "~~ (~~nscuujm~~) with textus receptus and		:''copt'' holds to “book” (πϫωμ) with ''textus receptus'' and
	exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.		:exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.
	Here Latin and Coptic come very strong against Sah		Here ''Latin'' and ''Coptic'' come very strong against ''Sah''
	and Greek. But ~~^«^~~ (Goussen) really writes ~~cyHff~~ not		and ''Greek''. But ''sah'' (''Goussen'') really writes --- not
	~~eye~~ = ~~horttts~~ ? or silva ~~arbortcm~~, rather than ~~^vkov~~.		-- = ''hortus'' ? or ''silva arbortum'', rather than ''ξυλον''.

	(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)		(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)

Nick: /* Bohairic Coptic */

2023-05-07T09:29:43Z

Bohairic Coptic

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:29, 7 May 2023
Line 121:		Line 121:

	====Bohairic Coptic====		====Bohairic Coptic====
	[[~~BOHAIRIC VERSION~~ Revelation 22.19.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Bohairic Revelation 22:19]]		[[Image:Bohairic Version Revelation 22.19 Hoskier.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Bohairic Revelation 22:19]]
	Bohairic Coptic mss contain the word book. Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version, by H. C. Hoskier in 1911, has:		Bohairic Coptic mss contain the word book. Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version, by H. C. Hoskier in 1911, has:

Nick: /* Old Versions */

2023-05-07T09:28:46Z

Old Versions

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:28, 7 May 2023
Line 117:		Line 117:
	:For as the days of the tree of life shall be the days of the people in thee; for the works of their hands shall endure."(1)		:For as the days of the tree of life shall be the days of the people in thee; for the works of their hands shall endure."(1)

	====Old ~~Versions~~====		====Old Latin====
	Old Latin ~~and~~ Bohairic Coptic contain the word book.		Old Latin mss contain the word book.

			====Bohairic Coptic====
			[[BOHAIRIC VERSION Revelation 22.19.jpg\|thumb\|right\|Bohairic Revelation 22:19]]
			Bohairic Coptic mss contain the word book. Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version, by H. C. Hoskier in 1911, has:

			ibid, tov £v\ov pro /3i/3\ov sec. NAB and most (with sah) but
			copt holds to " book " (nscuujm) with textus receptus and
			exceedingly few Greeks but some Latins.
			Here Latin and Coptic come very strong against Sah
			and Greek. But ^«^ (Goussen) really writes cyHff not
			eye = horttts ? or silva arbortcm, rather than ^vkov.

			(Concerning the Date of the Bohairic Version - H. C. Hoskier - 1911)

	====Latin Vulgate====		====Latin Vulgate====

Nick: /* Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia */

2021-12-16T06:47:07Z

Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:47, 16 December 2021
Line 142:		Line 142:
	We do have an Andreas reference given in [http://www.historicism.com/Elliott/Appendix1-3.htm Horae Apocalypticae], by Edward Bishop Elliott. Vol.4 (1852)		We do have an Andreas reference given in [http://www.historicism.com/Elliott/Appendix1-3.htm Horae Apocalypticae], by Edward Bishop Elliott. Vol.4 (1852)

	In his concluding summary Andreas states very distinctly his view of the Apocalypse being a prophecy of the things that were to happen from Christ’s first coming even to the consummation. In the section of Revelation 22:18-19 Andreas comments on the sin of adding to, or taking from divine Scripture, and he understands the passage as referring not only to the book of Apocalypse but to the whole revealed counsel of God. Notice how he quotes Revelation 22:18-19. :“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: (19) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part '''<u>out of the book of life</u>''', and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”		In his concluding summary Andreas states very distinctly his view of the Apocalypse being a prophecy of the things that were to happen from Christ’s first coming even to the consummation. In the section of Revelation 22:18-19 Andreas comments on the sin of adding to, or taking from divine Scripture, and he understands the passage as referring not only to the book of Apocalypse but to the whole revealed counsel of God. Notice how he quotes Revelation 22:18-19.
			:“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: (19) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part '''<u>out of the book of life</u>''', and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”

	====Primasius of Hadrumetum====		====Primasius of Hadrumetum====

Nick: /* Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia */

2021-12-16T06:46:46Z

Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 16 December 2021
Line 140:		Line 140:
	[[Andreas of Caesarea]] in Cappadocia (5th or 6th century) was a Greek theological writer and bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia. His principal work is a commentary on the Book of Revelation (Patrologia Graeca CVI, 215-458, 1387-94). It is the oldest surviving commentary on that book of the Bible, and a primary source, from which most of its later commentators have drawn. Andreas stands out from the majority of Byzantine commentators by his extensive acquaintance with early patristic literature.		[[Andreas of Caesarea]] in Cappadocia (5th or 6th century) was a Greek theological writer and bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia. His principal work is a commentary on the Book of Revelation (Patrologia Graeca CVI, 215-458, 1387-94). It is the oldest surviving commentary on that book of the Bible, and a primary source, from which most of its later commentators have drawn. Andreas stands out from the majority of Byzantine commentators by his extensive acquaintance with early patristic literature.

	We do have an Andreas reference given in Horae Apocalypticae, by Edward Bishop Elliott. Vol.4 (1852)		We do have an Andreas reference given in [http://www.historicism.com/Elliott/Appendix1-3.htm Horae Apocalypticae], by Edward Bishop Elliott. Vol.4 (1852)

	~~http://www.historicism.com/Elliott/Appendix1-3.htm~~		In his concluding summary Andreas states very distinctly his view of the Apocalypse being a prophecy of the things that were to happen from Christ’s first coming even to the consummation. In the section of Revelation 22:18-19 Andreas comments on the sin of adding to, or taking from divine Scripture, and he understands the passage as referring not only to the book of Apocalypse but to the whole revealed counsel of God. Notice how he quotes Revelation 22:18-19. :“For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: (19) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part '''<u>out of the book of life</u>''', and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”

	In his concluding summary Andreas states very distinctly his view of the Apocalypse being a prophecy of the things that were to happen from Christ’s first coming even to the consummation. In the section of Revelation 22:18-19 Andreas comments on the sin of adding to, or taking from divine Scripture, and he understands the passage as referring not only to the book of Apocalypse but to the whole revealed counsel of God.

	Notice how he quotes Revelation 22:18-19. ~~“ For~~ I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: (19) And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part ~~OUT OF THE BOOK OF LIFE (not “tree~~ of ~~life”)~~, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”

	====Primasius of Hadrumetum====		====Primasius of Hadrumetum====

Nick: /* Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia */

2021-12-15T11:39:12Z

Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 15 December 2021
Line 138:		Line 138:

	====Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia====		====Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia====
	Andreas of Caesarea in Cappadocia (5th or 6th century) was a Greek theological writer and bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia. His principal work is a commentary on the Book of Revelation (Patrologia Graeca CVI, 215-458, 1387-94). It is the oldest surviving commentary on that book of the Bible, and a primary source, from which most of its later commentators have drawn. Andreas stands out from the majority of Byzantine commentators by his extensive acquaintance with early patristic literature.		[[Andreas of Caesarea]] in Cappadocia (5th or 6th century) was a Greek theological writer and bishop of Caesarea in Cappadocia. His principal work is a commentary on the Book of Revelation (Patrologia Graeca CVI, 215-458, 1387-94). It is the oldest surviving commentary on that book of the Bible, and a primary source, from which most of its later commentators have drawn. Andreas stands out from the majority of Byzantine commentators by his extensive acquaintance with early patristic literature.

	We do have an Andreas reference given in Horae Apocalypticae, by Edward Bishop Elliott. Vol.4 (1852)		We do have an Andreas reference given in Horae Apocalypticae, by Edward Bishop Elliott. Vol.4 (1852)