Romans 4:10 - Revision history

Textus Receptus: /* External Links */

2018-04-20T16:38:51Z

External Links

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:38, 20 April 2018
Line 285:		Line 285:

	==External Links==		==External Links==
			* [http://www.standardbearers.net/uploads/Ahaziahs_Age_Upon_His_Accession_Chronology_of_the_OT_Dr_Floyd_Nolen_Jones_PhD_ThD.pdf Ahaziahs Age Upon His Accession Chronology of the OT] by Dr. Floyd Nolen Jones


			{{Donate}}

Beza 1598 at 13:44, 21 February 2017

2017-02-21T13:44:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:44, 21 February 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* '''[[Romans 4:10 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΡΩΜΑΙΟΥΣ 4:10]]''' πῶς οὖν ἐλογίσθη ἐν περιτομῇ ὄντι ἢ ἐν ἀκροβυστίᾳ οὐκ ἐν περιτομῇ ἀλλ' ἐν ἀκροβυστίᾳ·		* '''[[Romans 4:10 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\| ΠΡΟΣ ΡΩΜΑΙΟΥΣ 4:10]]''' πῶς οὖν ἐλογίσθη ἐν περιτομῇ ὄντι ἢ ἐν ἀκροβυστίᾳ οὐκ ἐν περιτομῇ ἀλλ' ἐν ἀκροβυστίᾳ·

	~~<small>''([[~~Textus Receptus (1598~~)\|Textus Receptus]], [[Theodore Beza]], [[1598 AD\|1598]])''</small>~~		{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}}

	* ''' Romans 4:10 ''' How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.		* ''' Romans 4:10 ''' How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision.

	~~<small>''([[~~King James Version~~]], [[~~Pure Cambridge Edition~~]] [[1900 AD\|1900]])''</small>~~		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

	* '''[[ Romans 4:10 ~~(TRV)~~\|Romans 4:10]]''' How then was it accounted? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised.		* '''[[ Romans 4:10 King James Version 2016\|Romans 4:10]]''' How then was it accounted? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised.

	~~<small>''([[Textus Receptus~~ Version~~]])''</small>~~		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

	==Interlinear==		==Interlinear==

Beza 1598: /* Theodore Beza */

2017-01-04T11:27:43Z

Theodore Beza

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 4 January 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[~~Matthew 1~~:1 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Romans 4:10 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)

Beza 1598: /* English Translations */

2014-06-02T14:36:37Z

English Translations

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 2 June 2014
Line 171:		Line 171:
	* [[1982 AD\|1982]] ([[New King James Version]])		* [[1982 AD\|1982]] ([[New King James Version]])

	* [[1984 AD\|1984]] ~~Under what circumstances was it credited? Was it after he was circumcised, or before? It was not after, but before!~~ ([[New International Version]])		* [[1984 AD\|1984]] ([[New International Version]])

	* [[1995 AD\|1995]] ~~How then was it credited? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised;~~ ([[New American Standard Bible]]) (©1995)		* [[1995 AD\|1995]] ([[New American Standard Bible]]) (©1995)

	* [[1999 AD\|1999]] ([[American King James Version]])[[AKJV]]		* [[1999 AD\|1999]] ([[American King James Version]])[[AKJV]]
Line 180:		Line 180:

	* ([[BBE]])		* ([[BBE]])
	* ~~In what way then was it credited—while he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while he was circumcised, but uncircumcised.~~ ([[Holman Christian Standard Bible]])		* ([[Holman Christian Standard Bible]])
	* ~~How was it then reckoned? When he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision!~~ ([[21st Century King James Version]])		* ([[21st Century King James Version]])
	* ~~So how was it credited? When he was circumcised, or when he wasn’t circumcised? In fact, it was credited while he still wasn’t circumcised, not after he was circumcised.~~ ([[Common English Bible]])		* ([[Common English Bible]])
	* ~~How was his faith regarded as the basis of God’s approval? Was he circumcised or was he uncircumcised at that time? He had not been circumcised.~~ ([[GOD’S WORD Translation]])		* ([[GOD’S WORD Translation]])
	* ~~But when did this happen? Was it before or after Abraham was circumcised? Of course, it was before.~~ ([[Contemporary English Version]])		* ([[Contemporary English Version]])
	* ~~But how did this happen? Was he counted as righteous only after he was circumcised, or was it before he was circumcised? Clearly, God accepted Abraham before he was circumcised!~~ ([[New Living Translation]])		* ([[New Living Translation]])
	* ~~How then was it credited [to him]? Was it before or after he had been circumcised? It was not after, but before he was circumcised.~~ ([[Amplified Bible]])		* ([[Amplified Bible]])
	* 10-11 Now think: Was that declaration made before or after he was marked by the covenant rite of circumcision? That’s right, before he was marked. That means that he underwent circumcision as evidence and confirmation of what God had done long before to bring him into this acceptable standing with himself, an act of God he had embraced with his whole life. ([[The Message]])		* ([[The Message]])
	* ~~When did it happen? Was it after Abraham was circumcised, or before? It was before he was circumcised, not after!~~ ([[New International Reader's Version]])		* ([[New International Reader's Version]])
	* ([[Wycliffe New Testament]])		* ([[Wycliffe New Testament]])

Beza 1598: /* Aramaic */

2013-07-12T08:24:50Z

Aramaic

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 12 July 2013
Line 197:		Line 197:

	====[[Aramaic]]====		====[[Aramaic]]====
	* <big></big>(Aramaic Peshitta)		* ܐܝܟܢܐ ܗܟܝܠ ܐܬܚܫܒܬ ܠܗ ܒܓܙܘܪܬܐ ܐܘ ܒܥܘܪܠܘܬܐ ܠܐ ܗܘܐ ܒܓܙܘܪܬܐ ܐܠܐ ܒܥܘܪܠܘܬܐ <big></big>(Aramaic Peshitta)

	====[[Basque]]====		====[[Basque]]====

Beza 1598: /* Arabic */

2013-07-12T08:24:22Z

Arabic

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 12 July 2013
Line 194:		Line 194:

	====[[Arabic]]====		====[[Arabic]]====
	* <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)		* فكيف حسب. أوهو في الختان ام في الغرلة. ليس في الختان بل في الغرلة. <big></big>(Arabic Smith & Van Dyke)

	====[[Aramaic]]====		====[[Aramaic]]====

Beza 1598: /* Bulgarian */

2013-07-12T08:24:10Z

Bulgarian

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 12 July 2013
Line 205:		Line 205:
	====[[Bulgarian]]====		====[[Bulgarian]]====

	* [[1940 AD\|1940]] (Bulgarian Bible)		* [[1940 AD\|1940]] то как му се вмени? Когато беше обрязан ли, или необрязан? Не когато беше обрязан, но необрязан. (Bulgarian Bible)

	====[[Chinese]]====		====[[Chinese]]====

Beza 1598: /* Basque */

2013-07-12T08:24:00Z

Basque

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 12 July 2013
Line 201:		Line 201:
	====[[Basque]]====		====[[Basque]]====

	*		* Nola bada imputatu içan çayo? circoncisionean cela, ala preputioan? ez circoncisionean, baina preputioan.

	====[[Bulgarian]]====		====[[Bulgarian]]====

Beza 1598: /* Latin */

2013-07-12T08:23:50Z

Latin

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 12 July 2013
Line 241:		Line 241:
	====[[Latin]]====		====[[Latin]]====

	* [[Latin Vulgate]]		* quomodo ergo reputata est in circumcisione an in praeputio non in circumcisione sed in praeputio [[Latin Vulgate]]

	* [[1527 AD\|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)		* [[1527 AD\|1527]] (Erasmus 1527)

Beza 1598: /* German */

2013-07-12T08:23:38Z

German

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:23, 12 July 2013
Line 223:		Line 223:
	====[[German]]====		====[[German]]====

	* [[1545 AD\|1545]] (Luther 1545)		* [[1545 AD\|1545]] Wie ist er ihm denn zugerechnet, in der Beschneidung oder in der Vorhaut? Ohne Zweifel nicht in der Beschneidung, sondern in der Vorhaut. (Luther 1545)

	* [[1871 AD\|1871]] (Elberfelder 1871)		* [[1871 AD\|1871]] Wie wurde er ihm denn zugerechnet? als er in der Beschneidung oder in der Vorhaut war? Nicht in der Beschneidung, sondern in der Vorhaut. (Elberfelder 1871)

	* [[1912 AD\|1912]] (Luther 1912)		* [[1912 AD\|1912]] Wie ist er ihm denn zugerechnet? Als er beschnitten oder als er unbeschnitten war? Nicht, als er beschnitten, sondern als er unbeschnitten war. (Luther 1912)

	====[[Italian]]====		====[[Italian]]====

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 4 January 2017
Line 49:		Line 49:
	* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)		* [[1590 AD\|1590]] (Beza Octavo 4th)
	* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)		* [[1598 AD\|1598]] (Beza 4th)
	''See Also [[~~Matthew 1~~:1 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''		''See Also [[Romans 4:10 Beza 1598]] ([[Theodore Beza\|Beza]])''
	* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)		* [[1604 AD\|1604]] (Beza Octavo 5th)