The Revision Revised by John William Burgon - Revision history

KJV: Template:Donate

2019-01-10T12:39:52Z

Template:Donate

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 10 January 2019
Line 21,817:		Line 21,817:

	*FINIS*		*FINIS*
	�
			{{Donate}}

Nick at 14:39, 19 January 2016

2016-01-19T14:39:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:39, 19 January 2016
Line 45:		Line 45:


	The following is PREBENDARY SCRIVENER’S recently published estimate of the		The following is PREBENDARY SCRIVENER’S recently published estimate of the System on which DRS. WESTCOTT AND HORT have constructed their “Revised Greek Text of the New Testament” (1881).—That System, the Chairman of the Revising Body (BISHOP ELLICOTT) has entirely adopted (see below, pp. 391 to 397), and made the basis of his Defence of THE REVISERS and their “New Greek Text.”
	System on which DRS. WESTCOTT AND HORT have constructed their ~~“_Revised~~
	Greek Text of the New ~~Testament_”~~ (1881).—That System, the Chairman of the
	Revising Body (BISHOP ELLICOTT) has entirely adopted (see below, pp. 391
	to 397), and made the basis of his Defence of THE REVISERS and their ~~“_New~~
	Greek Text._”


	:(1.) “There is little hope for the stability of their imposing		:(1.) “There is little hope for the stability of their imposing structure, if its foundations have been laid on the sandy ground of ingenious conjecture. And, since barely the smallest vestige of historical evidence has ever been alleged in support of the views of these accomplished Editors, their teaching must either be received as intuitively true, or dismissed from our consideration as precarious and even visionary.”
	structure, if ~~_its~~ foundations have been laid on the sandy ground
	of ingenious ~~conjecture_~~. And, since barely the smallest vestige
	of historical evidence has ever been alleged in support of the
	views of these accomplished Editors, their teaching must either be
	received as intuitively true, or ~~_dismissed~~ from our consideration
	as precarious and even ~~visionary_~~.”

	:(2.) “DR. HORT’S System _is entirely destitute of historical		:(2.) “DR. HORT’S System _is entirely destitute of historical foundation_.”
	foundation_.”

	:(3.) “We are compelled to repeat as emphatically as ever our		:(3.) “We are compelled to repeat as emphatically as ever our strong conviction that the Hypothesis to whose proof he has devoted so many laborious years, is destitute not only of historical foundation, but of all probability, resulting from the internal goodness of the Text which its adoption would force upon us.”
	strong conviction that the Hypothesis to whose proof he has
	devoted so many laborious years, ~~_is~~ destitute not only of
	historical foundation, but of all probability, resulting from the
	internal goodness of the Text which its adoption would force upon
	~~us_~~.”

	:(4.) “ ‘We cannot doubt’ (says DR. HORT) ‘that S. Luke xxiii. 34		:(4.) “ ‘We cannot doubt’ (says DR. HORT) ‘that S. Luke xxiii. 34 comes from an extraneous source.’ [_Notes_, p. 68.]—Nor can we, on our part, doubt,” rejoins DR. SCRIVENER,) “that the System which entails such consequences is hopelessly self-condemned.”
	comes from an extraneous source.’ [_Notes_, p. 68.]~~—_Nor~~ can we,
	on our part, ~~doubt_~~,” (rejoins DR. SCRIVENER,) ~~“_that~~ the System
	which entails such consequences is hopelessly self-~~condemned_~~.”


	SCRIVENER’S “Plain Introduction,” &c. [ed. 1883]: pp. 531, 537, 542, 604.		SCRIVENER’S “Plain Introduction,” &c. [ed. 1883]: pp. 531, 537, 542, 604.

Nick at 03:59, 20 December 2014

2014-12-20T03:59:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 20 December 2014
Line 92:		Line 92:
	MY DEAR LORD CRANBROOK,		MY DEAR LORD CRANBROOK,

	_Allow me the gratification of dedicating the present Volume to yourself;		_Allow me the gratification of dedicating the present Volume to yourself; but for whom—(I reserve the explanation for another day)—it would never have been written._
	but for whom—(I reserve the explanation for another day)—it would never
	have been written._

	_This is not, (as you will perceive at a glance,) the Treatise which a few		_This is not, (as you will perceive at a glance,) the Treatise which a few years ago I told you I had in hand; and which, but for the present
	years ago I told you I had in hand; and which, but for the present		hindrance, might by this time have been completed. It has however_ grown out _of that other work in the manner explained at the beginning of my
	hindrance, might by this time have been completed. It has however_ grown		Preface. Moreover it contains not a few specimens of the argumentation of which the work in question, when at last it sees the light, will be
	out _of that other work in the manner explained at the beginning of my
	Preface. Moreover it contains not a few specimens of the argumentation of
	which the work in question, when at last it sees the light, will be
	discovered to be full._		discovered to be full._

	_My one object has been to defeat the mischievous attempt which was made		_My one object has been to defeat the mischievous attempt which was made in 1881 to thrust upon this Church and Realm a Revision of the Sacred
	in 1881 to thrust upon this Church and Realm a Revision of the Sacred		Text, which—recommended though it be by eminent names—I am thoroughly convinced, and am able to prove, is untrustworthy from beginning to end._
	Text, which—recommended though it be by eminent names—I am thoroughly
	convinced, and am able to prove, is untrustworthy from beginning to end._

	_The reason is plain. It has been constructed throughout on an utterly		_The reason is plain. It has been constructed throughout on an utterly

Nick at 04:09, 19 December 2014

2014-12-19T04:09:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 19 December 2014
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:I. The New Greek Text.		:I. The New Greek Text.

	II. The New English Version.		:II. The New English Version.

	III. Westcott and Hort’s New Textual Theory.		:III. Westcott and Hort’s New Textual Theory.

	To Which is Added A		:To Which is Added A

	Reply to Bishop Ellicott’s Pamphlet		:Reply to Bishop Ellicott’s Pamphlet

	In Defence Of		:In Defence Of

	The Revisers and Their Greek Text of the New Testament:		:The Revisers and Their Greek Text of the New Testament:

	Including a Vindication of the Traditional Reading of 1 Timothy III. 16.		:Including a Vindication of the Traditional Reading of 1 Timothy III. 16.

	By John William Burgon, B.D.		:By John William Burgon, B.D.

	Dean of Chichester.		:Dean of Chichester.

	“Little children,—Keep yourselves from idols.”—1 John v. 21.		:“Little children,—Keep yourselves from idols.”—1 John v. 21.

	~~Dover Publications, Inc.~~

	~~New York~~		:CONTENTS

	~~1971~~

			:Dedication.
			:Preface.
			:Article I. The New Greek Text.
			:Article II. The New English Version.
			:Article III. Westcott And Hort’s New Textual Theory.
			:Letter To Bishop Ellicott, In Reply To His Pamphlet.
			:Appendix Of Sacred Codices.
			:Index I, of Texts of Scripture,—quoted, discussed, or only referred to in
			:this volume.
			:Index II, of Fathers.
			:Index III, Persons, Places, and Subjects.
			:Footnotes




	~~CONTENTS~~


	~~Dedication.~~
	~~Preface.~~
	~~Article I. The New Greek Text.~~
	~~Article II. The New English Version.~~
	~~Article III. Westcott And Hort’s New Textual Theory.~~
	~~Letter To Bishop Ellicott, In Reply To His Pamphlet.~~
	~~Appendix Of Sacred Codices.~~
	~~Index I, of Texts of Scripture,—quoted, discussed, or only referred to in~~
	~~this volume.~~
	~~Index II, of Fathers.~~
	~~Index III, Persons, Places, and Subjects.~~
	~~Footnotes~~






	~~[Transcriber’s Note: This book contains much Greek text, which will not be~~
	~~well-rendered in plain text versions of this E-book. Also, there is much~~
	~~use of Greek characters with a vertical bar across the tops of the letters~~
	~~to indicate abbreviations; because the coding system used in this e-book~~
	~~does not have such an “overline”, they are rendered here with underlines.~~
	~~It also contains some text in Syriac, which is written right-to-left; for~~
	~~the sake of different transcription methods, it is transcribed here in~~
	~~both right-to-left and left-to-rights, so that regardless of the medium of~~
	~~this E-book, one or the other should be readable.]~~

	The following is PREBENDARY SCRIVENER’S recently published estimate of the		The following is PREBENDARY SCRIVENER’S recently published estimate of the
Line 76:		Line 53:


	(1.) “There is little hope for the stability of their imposing		:(1.) “There is little hope for the stability of their imposing
	structure, if _its foundations have been laid on the sandy ground		structure, if _its foundations have been laid on the sandy ground
	of ingenious conjecture_. And, since barely the smallest vestige		of ingenious conjecture_. And, since barely the smallest vestige
Line 84:		Line 61:
	as precarious and even visionary_.”		as precarious and even visionary_.”

	(2.) “DR. HORT’S System _is entirely destitute of historical		:(2.) “DR. HORT’S System _is entirely destitute of historical
	foundation_.”		foundation_.”

	(3.) “We are compelled to repeat as emphatically as ever our		:(3.) “We are compelled to repeat as emphatically as ever our
	strong conviction that the Hypothesis to whose proof he has		strong conviction that the Hypothesis to whose proof he has
	devoted so many laborious years, _is destitute not only of		devoted so many laborious years, _is destitute not only of
Line 94:		Line 71:
	us_.”		us_.”

	(4.) “ ‘We cannot doubt’ (says DR. HORT) ‘that S. Luke xxiii. 34		:(4.) “ ‘We cannot doubt’ (says DR. HORT) ‘that S. Luke xxiii. 34
	comes from an extraneous source.’ [_Notes_, p. 68.]—_Nor can we,		comes from an extraneous source.’ [_Notes_, p. 68.]—_Nor can we,
	on our part, doubt_,” (rejoins DR. SCRIVENER,) “_that the System		on our part, doubt_,” (rejoins DR. SCRIVENER,) “_that the System

Nick at 15:30, 17 December 2014

2014-12-17T15:30:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:30, 17 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Revision Revised.		:The Revision Revised.

	Three Articles		:Three Articles

	Reprinted From The “Quarterly Review.”		:Reprinted From The “Quarterly Review.”

	I. The New Greek Text.		:I. The New Greek Text.

	II. The New English Version.		II. The New English Version.

Nick at 15:28, 17 December 2014

2014-12-17T15:28:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 17 December 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Revision Revised by John William Burgon~~



	~~This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no~~
	~~restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under~~
	~~the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or~~
	~~online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license~~



	~~Title: The Revision Revised~~

	~~Author: John William Burgon~~

	~~Release Date: July 13, 2011 [Ebook #36722]~~

	~~Language: English~~

	~~Character set encoding: UTF‐8~~


	~~*START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE REVISION REVISED*~~





	The Revision Revised.		The Revision Revised.

Nick: New page: The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Revision Revised by John William Burgon This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may co...

2014-12-17T15:27:21Z

New page: The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Revision Revised by John William Burgon This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may co...

Show changes