Matthew 1:16 - Revision history

Nick at 09:13, 13 May 2025

2025-05-13T09:13:40Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 13 May 2025
Line 260:		Line 260:
	* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Jacob engendra Joseph, l’époux de Marie, de laquelle est né Jésus, qui est appelé Christ. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>		* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Jacob engendra Joseph, l’époux de Marie, de laquelle est né Jésus, qui est appelé Christ. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>
	* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])		* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])
		+	* [[2022 AD\|2022]] Et Jacob engendra Joseph, le mari de Marie, de laquelle est né Jésus, qui est appelé Christ. ([[King James Française]])

	====[[German]]====		====[[German]]====

Nick at 21:51, 29 November 2024

2024-11-29T21:51:20Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:51, 29 November 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:
	{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}		{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}}

-	* '''[[Matthew 1:16 King James Version 2016\|Matthew 1:16]]''' [[1161\|And]] [[2384\|Jacob]] [[1080\|begot]] [[2501\|Joseph]] [[435\|the husband]] [[3137\|of Mary]], [[1537\|of]] [[3739\|whom]] [[1080\|was born]] [[2424\|Jesus]] [[3588\|who]] [[3004\|is called]] [[5547\|Christ]].	+	* '''[[Matthew 1:16 King James Version 2016\|Matthew 1:16]]''' [[1161\|And]] [[2384\|Jacob]] [[1080\|begot]] [[2501\|Joseph]] [[435\|the husband]] [[3137\|of Mary]], [[1537\|of]] [[3739\|whom]] [[1080\|was born]] [[2424\|Jesus]], [[3588\|who]] [[3004\|is called]] [[5547\|Christ]].

	{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}		{{King James Version 2016 Edition}}

Nick at 10:13, 14 September 2024

2024-09-14T10:13:38Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 14 September 2024
Line 258:		Line 258:
	* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Et Jacob fut père de Joseph, l'époux de Marie, de laquelle est né JÉSUS, appelé CHRIST. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>		* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Et Jacob fut père de Joseph, l'époux de Marie, de laquelle est né JÉSUS, appelé CHRIST. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>
	* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)		* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)
-	* [[1910 AD\|1910]]	+	* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Jacob engendra Joseph, l’époux de Marie, de laquelle est né Jésus, qui est appelé Christ. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>
	* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])		* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])

Beza 1598: /* Romainian */

2018-10-01T11:04:37Z

Romainian

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 1 October 2018
Line 333:		Line 333:
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>
-	* [[2015 AD\|2015]] Şi Iacob a născut pe Iosif, ~~soţul Mariei~~, din care a fost ~~născut Isus~~, care este numit Cristos. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>	+	* [[2015 AD\|2015]] Şi Iacob a născut pe Iosif, soţulMariei, din care a fost născutIsus, care este numit Cristos. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>

	====[[Russian]]====		====[[Russian]]====

Beza 1598: /* Romainian */

2018-10-01T09:32:13Z

Romainian

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 1 October 2018
Line 333:		Line 333:
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>
-	* [[2015 AD\|2015]] ~~16 Ş i~~ Iacob a născut pe Iosif, soţul Mariei, din care a fost născut Isus, care este numit Cristos. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>	+	* [[2015 AD\|2015]] Şi Iacob a născut pe Iosif, soţul Mariei, din care a fost născut Isus, care este numit Cristos. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>

	====[[Russian]]====		====[[Russian]]====

Beza 1598: /* Romainian */

2018-10-01T09:31:50Z

Romainian

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 1 October 2018
Line 333:		Line 333:
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba română - based upon the [[Textus Receptus]] / [[King James Version]])</small>
	* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>		* [[2014 AD\|2014]] <small>(Cornilescu 90th anniversary definitive edition - [[British and Foreign Bible Society]])</small>
		+	* [[2015 AD\|2015]] 16 Ş i Iacob a născut pe Iosif, soţul Mariei, din care a fost născut Isus, care este numit Cristos. <small>([[Fidela Bible\|Biblia Traducerea Fidela în limba româna]])</small>

	====[[Russian]]====		====[[Russian]]====

Nick at 20:25, 4 July 2018

2018-07-04T20:25:03Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:25, 4 July 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Template:Verses in Matthew 1}}		{{Template:Verses in Matthew 1}}
		+
		+	<center><< - [[Matthew 1:15]] - [[Matthew 1:17]] - >></center>
		+
	* '''[[Matthew 1:16 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\|ΚΑΤΑ ΜΑΤΘΑΙΟΝ 1:16]]''' [[2384\|Ἰακὼβ]] [[1161\|δὲ]] [[1080\|ἐγέννησε]] [[3588\|τὸν]] [[2501\|Ἰωσὴφ]], [[3588\|τὸν]] [[435\|ἄνδρα]] [[3137\|Μαρίας]] [[1537\|ἐξ]] [[3739\|ἧς]] [[1080\|ἐγεννήθη]] [[2424\|ἸΗΣΟΥΣ]] [[3588\|ὁ]] [[3004\|λεγόμενος]] [[5547\|Χριστός]].		* '''[[Matthew 1:16 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)\|ΚΑΤΑ ΜΑΤΘΑΙΟΝ 1:16]]''' [[2384\|Ἰακὼβ]] [[1161\|δὲ]] [[1080\|ἐγέννησε]] [[3588\|τὸν]] [[2501\|Ἰωσὴφ]], [[3588\|τὸν]] [[435\|ἄνδρα]] [[3137\|Μαρίας]] [[1537\|ἐξ]] [[3739\|ἧς]] [[1080\|ἐγεννήθη]] [[2424\|ἸΗΣΟΥΣ]] [[3588\|ὁ]] [[3004\|λεγόμενος]] [[5547\|Χριστός]].

Line 401:		Line 404:
	* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_1:16 Wikipedia Article on Matthew 1:16]		* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_1:16 Wikipedia Article on Matthew 1:16]
	* [https://feasite.org/node/2626 The Virgin Birth in the Revised Standard Version]		* [https://feasite.org/node/2626 The Virgin Birth in the Revised Standard Version]
		+
		+	<center><< - [[Matthew 1:15]] - [[Matthew 1:17]] - >></center>

	==Commentaries==		==Commentaries==

Nick: /* Revised Standard Version Footnote */

2018-04-01T12:06:00Z

Revised Standard Version Footnote

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 1 April 2018
Line 42:		Line 42:
	:Well, the introduction of this unbelieving and unwarranted footnote is one change which does not augur well for future changes.[https://feasite.org/node/2626 ]		:Well, the introduction of this unbelieving and unwarranted footnote is one change which does not augur well for future changes.[https://feasite.org/node/2626 ]

-	In 1953, Oswald T. Allis wrote in his Critique of the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament, Revised Version, or Revised Bible:	+	In 1953, Oswald T. Allis wrote in his Critique of the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament, Revised Version, or Revised Bible[http://www.bible-researcher.com/rsv.ot.allis.html ]:
	:It is important to note in this connection, that in the NT, the RSV Bible which has introduced a considerable number [p. 49] of changes (about 80) in the edition published in 1946, has added a marginal note at Matt. 1:16: “Other ancient authorities read, Joseph, to whom was betrothed the virgin Mary, was the father of Jesus who is called Christ.” This is practically the same as the reading given in the Moffatt version. Its main, some would say, its only clear supportis the Sinaitic Syriac Ms., a palimpsest of about the beginning of the 5th century. Consequently the statement, “other ancient authorities read” is both vague and misleading. Furthermore, the reading in question is decidedly doubtful, since it is self-contradictory. It mentions Mary the virgin, but also says that Joseph “begat.” That RSV should use the opportunity of the publication of the completed RSV Bible to insert this footnote at Matt. 1:16 indicates clearly how little warrant there is for the hope expressed in some quarters that changes can or will be made in RSV which will make this version acceptable to Evangelical Christians. The version was prepared by Liberals, it is owned by Liberals; and they will see to it that this hope is not realized! [https://mafiadoc.com/revised-version-or-revised-bible-bible-research_5a204fe41723ddbea5101215.html ] <sup>REVISED VERSION OR REVISED BIBLE? A Critique of the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament (1952) By OSWALD T. ALLIS</sup>		:It is important to note in this connection, that in the NT, the RSV Bible which has introduced a considerable number [p. 49] of changes (about 80) in the edition published in 1946, has added a marginal note at Matt. 1:16: “Other ancient authorities read, Joseph, to whom was betrothed the virgin Mary, was the father of Jesus who is called Christ.” This is practically the same as the reading given in the Moffatt version. Its main, some would say, its only clear supportis the Sinaitic Syriac Ms., a palimpsest of about the beginning of the 5th century. Consequently the statement, “other ancient authorities read” is both vague and misleading. Furthermore, the reading in question is decidedly doubtful, since it is self-contradictory. It mentions Mary the virgin, but also says that Joseph “begat.” That RSV should use the opportunity of the publication of the completed RSV Bible to insert this footnote at Matt. 1:16 indicates clearly how little warrant there is for the hope expressed in some quarters that changes can or will be made in RSV which will make this version acceptable to Evangelical Christians. The version was prepared by Liberals, it is owned by Liberals; and they will see to it that this hope is not realized! [https://mafiadoc.com/revised-version-or-revised-bible-bible-research_5a204fe41723ddbea5101215.html ] <sup>REVISED VERSION OR REVISED BIBLE? A Critique of the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament (1952) By OSWALD T. ALLIS</sup>

Nick: /* Revised Standard Version Footnote */

2018-04-01T12:01:51Z

Revised Standard Version Footnote

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 1 April 2018
Line 41:		Line 41:

	:Well, the introduction of this unbelieving and unwarranted footnote is one change which does not augur well for future changes.[https://feasite.org/node/2626 ]		:Well, the introduction of this unbelieving and unwarranted footnote is one change which does not augur well for future changes.[https://feasite.org/node/2626 ]
		+
		+	In 1953, Oswald T. Allis wrote in his Critique of the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament, Revised Version, or Revised Bible:
		+	:It is important to note in this connection, that in the NT, the RSV Bible which has introduced a considerable number [p. 49] of changes (about 80) in the edition published in 1946, has added a marginal note at Matt. 1:16: “Other ancient authorities read, Joseph, to whom was betrothed the virgin Mary, was the father of Jesus who is called Christ.” This is practically the same as the reading given in the Moffatt version. Its main, some would say, its only clear supportis the Sinaitic Syriac Ms., a palimpsest of about the beginning of the 5th century. Consequently the statement, “other ancient authorities read” is both vague and misleading. Furthermore, the reading in question is decidedly doubtful, since it is self-contradictory. It mentions Mary the virgin, but also says that Joseph “begat.” That RSV should use the opportunity of the publication of the completed RSV Bible to insert this footnote at Matt. 1:16 indicates clearly how little warrant there is for the hope expressed in some quarters that changes can or will be made in RSV which will make this version acceptable to Evangelical Christians. The version was prepared by Liberals, it is owned by Liberals; and they will see to it that this hope is not realized! [https://mafiadoc.com/revised-version-or-revised-bible-bible-research_5a204fe41723ddbea5101215.html ] <sup>REVISED VERSION OR REVISED BIBLE? A Critique of the Revised Standard Version of the Old Testament (1952) By OSWALD T. ALLIS</sup>

	==Greek==		==Greek==

Nick: /* Commentary */

2018-04-01T11:47:15Z

Commentary

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 1 April 2018
Line 24:		Line 24:

	: Ιησους (''Jesus'') — omitted by ƒ<sup>1</sup>		: Ιησους (''Jesus'') — omitted by ƒ<sup>1</sup>
		+
		+	===Revised Standard Version Footnote===
		+	In 1952, the [[Revised Standard Version]] contained the following blasphemous footnote:
		+	:"Other ancient authorities read Joseph, to whom was betrothed the virgin Mary, was the father of Jesus who is called Christ."
		+
		+	Dr. Alva J. McClain (1888-1968) in the February 28, 1953 issue of The Brethren Missionary Herald, pp. 137-139 wrote:
		+	:For this particular piece of skullduggery (not an unfair characterization), the makers of the RSV kept outside the actual Virgin Birth passage which appears in Matthew 1:18-25, and centered their attention on verse 16. In both the KJV and ASV this verse is translated, "And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ." And this is exactly what the Greek says. The RSV, with its much publicized antipathy to the verb "begat," omits this word and puts in three words, "the father of," which have nothing to represent them in the Greek. But otherwise the verse is left intact, reading in part, "Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ." In English the pronoun "whom" is ambiguous and might be singular or plural, masculine or feminine. But the Greek pronoun is singular and feminine, pointing clearly to Mary alone.
		+
		+	:But consider now a very curious footnote which the RSV has placed in the margin in connection with verse 16. This footnote reads as follows: "Other ancient authorities read Joseph, to whom was betrothed the virgin Mary, was the father of Jesus who is called Christ." This reading, of course, clearly asserts that Joseph was the father of Jesus. Let us examine this specimen of modernistic scholarship.
		+
		+	:First, they say that this reading occurs in "other ancient authorities." This sounds very impressive. But what are these "ancient authorities," and how many are there? Well, the answer is that there is not even so much as one manuscript of the Greek New Testament that contains the above reading! It is found only in an old version, the Sinaitic Syriac discovered in 1892.
		+
		+	:Second, it should be pointed out that if all the insignificant variant readings which may be found in the ancient versions, to say nothing of the more important ancient manuscripts, had been included in the footnotes of the RSV New Testament, most of it would be foot- notes! As any reader can easily see, very few of these variants are included in the footnotes. Why then, out of all the many thousands of variants, did the makers of the RSV put this one in, a reading with almost a complete lack of worth-while evidence? Again, there is no answer except the stubborn theological bias of the translators against the Virgin Birth.
		+
		+	:Third, worst of all for the revisers committee, this particular footnote was not in the RSV New Testament which was published in 1946, but it was slipped into the final product when the entire Bible was published in 1952. Again, one cannot help wondering just why it happened this way. Could it be that the restraint which kept it out of the New Testament in 1946 was the fear of having such a shocking footnote appear on the first page of the first book which the readers would meet when they opened the RSV New Testament? Certainly it was easier to put it into the 1952 publication of the entire RSV Bible after the earlier 1946 New Testament had been examined critically, and when the attention of readers would be concentrated on the Old Testament. As a matter of fact, its presence was not known to some men who thought they knew what was in the RSV New Testament because they had examined it with great care when first issued in 1946. A great deal has been made of the so-called willingness of the revisers to make suggested changes of any of their work that needs correction, as indicated by some 80 alleged changes made between the 1946 and 1952 editions of the New Testament.
		+
		+	:Well, the introduction of this unbelieving and unwarranted footnote is one change which does not augur well for future changes.[https://feasite.org/node/2626 ]

	==Greek==		==Greek==

←Older revision		Revision as of 10:13, 14 September 2024
Line 258:		Line 258:
	* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Et Jacob fut père de Joseph, l'époux de Marie, de laquelle est né JÉSUS, appelé CHRIST. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>		* [[1744 AD\|1744]] Et Jacob fut père de Joseph, l'époux de Marie, de laquelle est né JÉSUS, appelé CHRIST. <small>(Ostervald 1744)</small>
	* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)		* [[1864 AD\|1864]] (Augustin Crampon)
-	* [[1910 AD\|1910]]	+	* [[1910 AD\|1910]] Jacob engendra Joseph, l’époux de Marie, de laquelle est né Jésus, qui est appelé Christ. <small>(Louis Segond)</small>
	* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])		* [[2006 AD\|2006]] ([[King James Française]])