The Facts on the King James Only Debate: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The Facts on the King James Only Debate is written by [[John Ankerberg]]. It askes and claims: ''Is the King James Bible the most accurate version? Readers will discover what texts the King James Version’s translators used, what they said about their work, how the King James Version compares to other modern translations, and more.'' | The Facts on the King James Only Debate is written by [[John Ankerberg]]. It askes and claims: ''Is the King James Bible the most accurate version? Readers will discover what texts the King James Version’s translators used, what they said about their work, how the King James Version compares to other modern translations, and more.'' | ||
Ankerberg claims that all versions are the Word of God and overlooks many strong arguments for the [[King james Version]]. He mostly answered critics from hyper KJVO backgrounds but failed to give correct answers on many topics. | |||
Revision as of 14:35, 17 April 2010
The Facts on the King James Only Debate is written by John Ankerberg. It askes and claims: Is the King James Bible the most accurate version? Readers will discover what texts the King James Version’s translators used, what they said about their work, how the King James Version compares to other modern translations, and more.
Ankerberg claims that all versions are the Word of God and overlooks many strong arguments for the King james Version. He mostly answered critics from hyper KJVO backgrounds but failed to give correct answers on many topics.