Nestle-Aland 26th Edition: Difference between revisions

From Textus Receptus
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m Protected "Nestle-Aland 26th Edition" [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed]
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
"When Eberhard Nestle produced the first edition of the [[Novum Testamentum Graece]] in [[1898 AD|1898]], neither he nor the sponsoring Wurttemburg Bible Society could have imagined the full extent of what hd been started. Although the Textus [[Receptus]] could still claim a wide range of defenders, the scholarship of the nineteenth century had conclusively demonstrated it to be the poorest form of the New Testament text." (Introduction to Novum Testamentum Graece - Nestle-Aland 26th Edition)
"When Eberhard Nestle produced the first edition of the [[Novum Testamentum Graece]] in [[1898 AD|1898]], neither he nor the sponsoring Wurttemburg [[Bible Society]] could have imagined the full extent of what had been started. Although the [[Textus Receptus]] could still claim a wide range of defenders, the scholarship of the nineteenth century had conclusively demonstrated it to be the poorest form of the [[New Testament]] text." (Introduction to [[Novum Testamentum Graece]] - Nestle-Aland 26th Edition)


The above states that the Textus Receptus is the "poorest form of the New Testament text"
The above states that the Textus Receptus is the "poorest form of the New Testament text"

Latest revision as of 03:51, 18 April 2010

"When Eberhard Nestle produced the first edition of the Novum Testamentum Graece in 1898, neither he nor the sponsoring Wurttemburg Bible Society could have imagined the full extent of what had been started. Although the Textus Receptus could still claim a wide range of defenders, the scholarship of the nineteenth century had conclusively demonstrated it to be the poorest form of the New Testament text." (Introduction to Novum Testamentum Graece - Nestle-Aland 26th Edition)

The above states that the Textus Receptus is the "poorest form of the New Testament text"