Luke 3:36: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Verses in Luke 3}} | {{Verses in Luke 3}} | ||
'''Luke 3:36''' Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech, | * '''[[Luke 3:36 Greek NT: Beza's Textus Receptus (1598)|ΚΑΤΑ ΛΟΥΚΑΝ 3:36]]''' | ||
{{Textus Receptus 1598 Footer}} | |||
* '''Luke 3:36''' Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech, | |||
{{King James Version Pure Cambridge Edition Footer}} | |||
{{Progressive King James Version}} | |||
==Interlinear== | |||
Revision as of 10:13, 15 July 2015
(Textus Receptus, Novum Testamentum, Theodore Beza, 5th major edition. Geneva. 1598)
- Luke 3:36 Which was the son of Cainan, which was the son of Arphaxad, which was the son of Sem, which was the son of Noe, which was the son of Lamech,
(King James Version, Pure Cambridge Edition 1900)
(King James Version 2016 Edition, 2016)